BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7638977)

  • 21. New abortion laws introduce informed and parental consent.
    Family Plan World; 1991; 1(2):25. PubMed ID: 12284517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of minors' and adults' pregnancy decisions.
    Lewis CC
    Am J Orthopsychiatry; 1980 Jul; 50(3):446-453. PubMed ID: 7406029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law.
    Pirner RK; Williams LB
    Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Medicine and the law: treatment of minors--consent requirements.
    Young MG
    Tex Med; 1983 Jan; 79(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 6687501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Abortion.
    Alan Guttmacher Institute AGI
    State Reprod Health Monit; 1993 May; 4(2):1-27. PubMed ID: 12286571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Constitutional law -- Fifth Circuit holds that requiring the consent of both parents does not unduly burden a minor's right to abortion -- Barnes v. Mississippi.
    Jackson CP
    Temple Law Rev; 1994; 67(4):1357-86. PubMed ID: 11660074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Teenage abortion in Germany: with reference to the legal system in the United States.
    Belling DW; Eberl C
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):475-502. PubMed ID: 8666732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Parental involvement laws and fertility behavior.
    Levine PB
    J Health Econ; 2003 Sep; 22(5):861-78. PubMed ID: 12946463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adolescent autonomy and minors' legal rights: contraception and abortion.
    Rodman H; Griffith SB
    J Appl Dev Psychol; 1982; 3(4):307-18. PubMed ID: 12266643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. New law will reduce teen pregnancy, family planners predict.
    Contracept Technol Update; 1986 Mar; 7(3):25-8. PubMed ID: 12341225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents.
    Ehrlich JS
    Berkeley Womens Law J; 2003; 18():61-180. PubMed ID: 15156878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Adolescent abortion and mandated parental involvement.
    Johannsen L
    Pediatr Nurs; 1995; 21(1):82-4. PubMed ID: 7715978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Consent requirements for treatment of minors.
    Thompson HA
    Tex Med; 1989 Aug; 85(8):56-9. PubMed ID: 2763219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. New abortion parental involvement laws continue trend toward modified requirements.
    Donovan P
    State Reprod Health Monit; 1995 Sep; 6(3):3-6. PubMed ID: 12346847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Should parents be notified of their minor daughter's abortion? A pregnant question for Florida legislators.
    Parsons CE
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1986; 14(3):719-43. PubMed ID: 11658962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
    Peterfy A
    J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Parental involvement in adolescent abortion decisions: a legal and psychological critique.
    Embree MG; Dobson TA
    Law Inequal; 1991 Dec; 10(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 11659634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. U.S. Supreme Court refuses to review decision invalidating provisions in Louisiana parental consent law.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1997 Oct; 6(18):2. PubMed ID: 12321265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Parental consent for abortion: impact of the Massachusetts law.
    Cartoof VG; Klerman LV
    Am J Public Health; 1986 Apr; 76(4):397-400. PubMed ID: 3953915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Missouri loses latest round in battle over permissible abortion regulations.
    Baldwin ML
    UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 50(3):320-39. PubMed ID: 11658633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.