These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7639404)

  • 21. Using an intravenous catheter system to prevent needlestick injury.
    Sossai D; Puro V; Chiappatoli L; Dagnino G; Odone B; Polimeri A; Ruzza L; Palombo P; Fuscoe MS; Scognamiglio P
    Nurs Stand; 2010 Mar 24-30; 24(29):42-6. PubMed ID: 20426370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Safety-engineered devices to prevent percutaneous injuries: cost-effectiveness analysis on prevention of high-risk exposure].
    Armadans Gil L; Fernández Cano MI; Albero Andrés I; Anglés Mellado ML; Sánchez García JM; Campins Martí M; Vaqué Rafart J
    Gac Sanit; 2006; 20(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 17040646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison between two intermittent intravenous systems without needles.
    Savino SR; Napolitano B
    J Intraven Nurs; 1994; 17(5):256-60. PubMed ID: 7965371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Costs of management of occupational exposures to blood and body fluids.
    O'Malley EM; Scott RD; Gayle J; Dekutoski J; Foltzer M; Lundstrom TS; Welbel S; Chiarello LA; Panlilio AL
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2007 Jul; 28(7):774-82. PubMed ID: 17564978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Implementation of a customized needleless intravenous delivery system.
    Terrell F; Williams B
    J Intraven Nurs; 1993; 16(6):339-44. PubMed ID: 8301406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reducing needlestick and sharps injuries among healthcare workers.
    Gabriel J
    Nurs Stand; 2009 Feb 4-10; 23(22):41-4. PubMed ID: 19263961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of a safety resheathable winged steel needle for prevention of percutaneous injuries associated with intravascular-access procedures among healthcare workers.
    Mendelson MH; Lin-Chen BY; Solomon R; Bailey E; Kogan G; Goldbold J
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 24(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 12602692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Costs and benefits of measures to prevent needlestick injuries in a university hospital.
    Laufer FN; Chiarello L
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2000 Aug; 21(8):494. PubMed ID: 10968710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An outbreak of needlestick injuries in hospital employees due to needles piercing infectious waste containers.
    Anglim AM; Collmer JE; Loving TJ; Beltran KA; Coyner BJ; Adal K; Jagger J; Sojka NJ; Farr BM
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1995 Oct; 16(10):570-6. PubMed ID: 8568201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impact of introduction of sharps containers and of education programmes on the pattern of needle stick injuries in a tertiary care centre in India.
    Richard VS; Kenneth J; Ramaprabha P; Kirupakaran H; Chandy GM
    J Hosp Infect; 2001 Feb; 47(2):163-5. PubMed ID: 11170783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Needlestick injuries: going but not gone?
    Nelson R
    Am J Nurs; 2004 Nov; 104(11):25-6. PubMed ID: 15616443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The benefits and limitations of needle protectors and needleless intravenous systems.
    Orenstein R
    J Intraven Nurs; 1999; 22(3):122-8. PubMed ID: 10640075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Percutaneous injury analysis: consistent categorization, effective reduction methods, and future strategies.
    Haiduven DJ; Phillips ES; Clemons KV; Stevens DA
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1995 Oct; 16(10):582-9. PubMed ID: 8568203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel.
    Lavoie MC; Verbeek JH; Pahwa M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD009740. PubMed ID: 24610008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Needlestick-prevention devices.
    Health Devices; 1994; 23(8-9):316-69. PubMed ID: 7860323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A follow-up evaluation to a needle-free i.v. system.
    Wolfrum J
    Nurs Manage; 1994 Dec; 25(12):33-5. PubMed ID: 7800293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Needleless i.v. therapy: comparing three systems for safety.
    Prince K; Summers L; Knight MA
    Nurs Manage; 1994 Mar; 25(3):80N, 80P. PubMed ID: 8134048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of an educational program and mechanical opening needle disposal boxes on occupational needlestick injuries.
    Sellick JA; Hazamy PA; Mylotte JM
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1991 Dec; 12(12):725-31. PubMed ID: 1813579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Potentially dangerous fracture of the needleless interlink vial access cannula.
    Kohli N; Florence FB
    Anesthesiology; 2005 Mar; 102(3):703-4; discussion 704. PubMed ID: 15731629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Decreasing central line infections and needlestick injury rates: combining best practice and introducing a luer-activated intravenous therapy system and antimicrobial intravenous connector.
    Charron K
    J Infus Nurs; 2012; 35(6):370-5. PubMed ID: 23132085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.