103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7639429)
1. Purpose of CR-CO study clear.
Williams RE
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(3):165-6. PubMed ID: 7639429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. CR-CO study well done.
Cordray FE
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(3):164-5. PubMed ID: 7639428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The CR-CO discrepancy and its effect on cephalometric measurements.
Shildkraut M; Wood DP; Hunter WS
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(5):333-42. PubMed ID: 7794320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The CR-CO interchange.
Parker WS
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(3):164. PubMed ID: 7639427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional analysis of models articulated in the seated condylar position from a deprogrammed asymptomatic population: a prospective study. Part 1.
Cordray FE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):619-30. PubMed ID: 16679202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maxillo- mandibular relationship--a cephalometric study.
Kapoor DN; Chandana A; Tandon S
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2004 Sep; 22(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 15573662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discrepancies between centric occlusion and centric relation in orthodontically treated patients.
Gaither EL; Sadowsky PL; Vlachos CC; Wallace DD
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 9456615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Reproducibility of centric relation of the patient with severe dental attrition for oral rehabilitation].
Kang H; Chao Y; Yi X
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Dec; 21(6):457-9. PubMed ID: 14732981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Method to verify the accuracy of model surgery and prediction tracing.
Omura T; Glickman RS; Super S
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 9456630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Condylar axis position, as determined by the occlusion and measured by the CPI instrument, and signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction.
Crawford SD
Angle Orthod; 1999 Apr; 69(2):103-15; discussion 115-6. PubMed ID: 10227550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Centric relation treatment.
Leever DL
Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(4):244. PubMed ID: 8863955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The CR-CO discrepancy.
Rinchuse DJ
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 7726461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Centric relation treatment.
Storey AT
Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(4):244-5. PubMed ID: 8863956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of the POLY and AART occlusal techniques in the fabrication of a fixed detachable implant reconstruction.
Pitel ML
Dent Today; 2001 Jul; 20(7):98-105. PubMed ID: 11462350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. More comments on Rinchuse Counterpoint.
Chhatwani B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Dec; 108(6):13A. PubMed ID: 7503031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Techniques in recording centric relation.
Hartzell DH; Maskeroni AJ; Certosimo FC
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):234-6. PubMed ID: 11203822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cephalometry and centric occlusion].
Staehle G
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1974 Jun; 29(6):563. PubMed ID: 4527212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Accurate bite records: improving restorative predictability.
Scott J
Dent Today; 2010 Jan; 29(1):124, 126-7. PubMed ID: 20084860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. More comments on Rinchuse Counterpoint.
Chubb TK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Dec; 108(6):13A-14A; author reply 14A-16A. PubMed ID: 7503032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation between centric relation–maximum intercuspation discrepancy and temporomandibular joint dysfunction.
He SS; Deng X; Wamalwa P; Chen S
Acta Odontol Scand; 2010 Nov; 68(6):368-76. PubMed ID: 20942605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
