These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7640024)

  • 1. JPEG compression of digital echocardiographic images: impact on image quality.
    Karson TH; Chandra S; Morehead AJ; Stewart WJ; Nissen SE; Thomas JD
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 1995; 8(3):306-18. PubMed ID: 7640024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Texture analysis in digitally-acquired echocardiographic images: the effect of JPEG compression and video storage.
    Aschkenasy SV; Muntwyler J; van der Loo B; Oechslin E; Jenni R
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 31(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 15749559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital storage of echocardiograms offers superior image quality to analog storage, even with 20:1 digital compression: results of the Digital Echo Record Access Study.
    Karson TH; Zepp RC; Chandra S; Morehead A; Thomas JD
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 1996; 9(6):769-78. PubMed ID: 8943436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feasibility and clinical value of "intelligent" compression and digital storage of transthoracic echocardiograms in day-to-day practice.
    Badano LP; Dall'Armellina E; Bordin P; Di Chiara A; Popiel M; Werren M; Fioretti PM
    Ital Heart J; 2001 Oct; 2(10):782-8. PubMed ID: 11721724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image compression in morphometry studies requiring 21 CFR Part 11 compliance: procedure is key with TIFFs and various JPEG compression strengths.
    Tengowski MW
    Toxicol Pathol; 2004; 32(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 15200165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital storage and analysis of color Doppler echocardiograms.
    Chandra S; Thomas JD
    Echocardiography; 1997 Jan; 14(1):91-102. PubMed ID: 11174929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. JPEG compression of stereoscopic digital images for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy via teleophthalmology.
    Baker CF; Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Sanghera P; Hinz BJ; De Leon AR; Greve MD
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 39(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 15696764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital compression of echocardiograms: impact on quantitative interpretation of color Doppler velocity.
    Thomas JD; Chandra S; Karson TH; Pu M; Vandervoort PM
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 1996; 9(5):606-15. PubMed ID: 8887862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is JPEG compression of videomicroscopic images compatible with telediagnosis? Comparison between diagnostic performance and pattern recognition on uncompressed TIFF images and JPEG compressed ones.
    Seidenari S; Pellacani G; Righi E; Di Nardo A
    Telemed J E Health; 2004; 10(3):294-303. PubMed ID: 15650524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wavelet versus JPEG (Joint Photographic Expert Group) and fractal compression. Impact on the detection of low-contrast details in computed radiographs.
    Ricke J; Maass P; Lopez Hänninen E; Liebig T; Amthauer H; Stroszczynski C; Schauer W; Boskamp T; Wolf M
    Invest Radiol; 1998 Aug; 33(8):456-63. PubMed ID: 9704285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of JPEG and JPEG2000 compression in quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
    Fidler A; Likar B; Pernus F; Skaleric U
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Nov; 31(6):379-84. PubMed ID: 12424637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is digital image compression acceptable within diabetic retinopathy screening?
    Basu A; Kamal AD; Illahi W; Khan M; Stavrou P; Ryder RE
    Diabet Med; 2003 Sep; 20(9):766-71. PubMed ID: 12925059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Grading, image analysis, and stereopsis of digitally compressed fundus images.
    Lee MS; Shin DS; Berger JW
    Retina; 2000; 20(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 10872933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of two compression algorithms and the detection of caries.
    Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; Sanderink GC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 12087443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of image compression viability for lossy and lossless JPEG and Wavelet data reduction in coronary angiography.
    Brennecke R; Bürgel U; Rippin G; Post F; Rupprecht HJ; Meyer J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2001 Feb; 17(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 11495503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of irreversible JPEG compression for a clinical ultrasound practice.
    Persons KR; Hangiandreou NJ; Charboneau NT; Charboneau J; James E; Douglas BR; Salmon AP; Knudsen JM; Erickson BJ
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Mar; 15(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 12134210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pediatric digital echocardiography: a study of the analog-to-digital transition.
    Mathewson JW; Perry JC; Maginot KR; Cocalis M
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2000 Jun; 13(6):561-9. PubMed ID: 10849510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinically compressed digital echocardiography: a patient-safe alternative to videotape review.
    Poh KK; Yang H; Omar AR; Yip JW; Chan YH; Ling LH
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2007 Aug; 36(8):662-71. PubMed ID: 17767337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of MPEG-1 digital videotape with digitized sVHS videotape for quantitative echocardiographic measurements.
    Garcia MJ; Thomas JD; Greenberg N; Sandelski J; Herrera C; Mudd C; Wicks J; Spencer K; Neumann A; Sankpal B; Soble J
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2001 Feb; 14(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 11174445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experience with a DICOM-compatible digital pediatric echocardiography laboratory.
    Frommelt PC; Whitstone EN; Frommelt MA
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2002; 23(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 11922509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.