72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7640102)
1. Contrast enhancement of the upper abdomen evaluated by CT. A comparison between iohexol 350 mg I/ml and iopamidol 370 mg I/ml.
Thorstensen O; Isberg B; Aspelin P
Acta Radiol; 1995 Sep; 36(5):549-51. PubMed ID: 7640102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-enhanced CT of the liver and spleen: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
Nelson RC; Chezmar JL; Peterson JE; Bernardino ME
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Nov; 153(5):973-6. PubMed ID: 2801447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abdominal helical CT: evaluation of optimal doses of intravenous contrast material--a prospective randomized study.
Yamashita Y; Komohara Y; Takahashi M; Uchida M; Hayabuchi N; Shimizu T; Narabayashi I
Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):718-23. PubMed ID: 10966700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Plain abdominal film after contrast-enhanced CT; re-evaluation by using iohexol].
Ishii C; Toyoda K; Tada S
Rinsho Hoshasen; 1989 May; 34(5):599-604. PubMed ID: 2746956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of iohexol and metrizamide in dynamic CT of the upper abdomen.
Partanen K; Kormano M; Kivimäki T; Soimakallio S
Eur J Radiol; 1984 Aug; 4(3):227-8. PubMed ID: 6468419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast material for combined abdominal and pelvic CT: can cost be reduced by increasing the concentration and decreasing the volume?
Baker ME; Beam C; Leder R; Gulliver D; Paine SS; Dunnick NR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):637-41. PubMed ID: 8430570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative investigation of i.v. iohexol and iopamidol: effect on renal function in low-risk outpatients undergoing CT.
Dillman JR; al-Hawary M; Ellis JH; Cohan RH; Kaza R; Myles JD; Khalatbari S; Francis IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):392-7. PubMed ID: 22268183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hepatic dynamic sequential CT: section enhancement profiles with a bolus of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
Nelson RC; Moyers JH; Chezmar JL; Hoel MJ; Jones EC; Peterson JE; Cork RD; Bernardino ME
Radiology; 1991 Feb; 178(2):499-502. PubMed ID: 1987614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Effects of computed tomography contrast medium factors on contrast enhancement].
Terasawa K; Hatcho A; Okuda I
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(12):1583-91. PubMed ID: 22186204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhancement with water-soluble contrast media in computed tomography of the brain and abdomen. Survey and present state.
Skalpe IO
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():72-5. PubMed ID: 6382938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Improved contrast enhancement with a positive pressure drip infusion method and 350 mg I/ml high concentration contrast media in routine contrast enhanced CT].
Okuhata Y; Yasukochi H; Lee K; Murakami K; Tanibe M; Koga M; Shirato M; Nagai J; Kuniyasu Y
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jan; 49(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 2734079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 1-molar gadobutrol as a contrast agent for computed tomography: results from a comparative porcine study.
Kalinowski M; Kress O; Wels T; Alfke H; Klose KJ; Wagner HJ
Invest Radiol; 2003 Apr; 38(4):193-9. PubMed ID: 12649642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diffusion of contrast media in cerebrospinal fluid: comparison of iohexol, iopamidol and iotrolan in vitro.
Raininko R; Teräväinen H
Neuroradiology; 1992; 34(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 1630618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Iopamidol as an oral contrast media for computed tomography: a taste comparison to iohexol, diatrizoate sodium, and barium sulfate.
Rogers D; Sheth C; Eisenmenger L; Mignogna E; Winter T
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Dec; 42(12):2822-2826. PubMed ID: 28669111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrast timing in computed tomography: effect of different contrast media concentrations on bolus geometry.
Mahnken AH; Jost G; Seidensticker P; Kuhl C; Pietsch H
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e629-32. PubMed ID: 22297184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative evaluation of pancreatic enhancement during dual-phase helical CT.
Hollett MD; Jorgensen MJ; Jeffrey RB
Radiology; 1995 May; 195(2):359-61. PubMed ID: 7724753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The effects of angiographic contrast media on the aggregation and morphology of red cells in vitro].
Higashi S; Yasukochi H; Ishioka K; Toya H; Tanibe M; Koga M; Shirato M
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jun; 49(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 2798065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extravasation of iopamidol and iohexol during contrast-enhanced CT: report of 28 cases.
Sistrom CL; Gay SB; Peffley L
Radiology; 1991 Sep; 180(3):707-10. PubMed ID: 1871281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hepatic CT enhancement: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents in the same patients.
Chambers TP; Baron RL; Lush RM; Dodd GD; Miller WJ
Radiology; 1994 Mar; 190(3):721-5. PubMed ID: 8115618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
