These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7640442)

  • 1. Technical note: bioluminescent bacterial test for acute toxicity: the effect of pH and buffer solutions.
    Andriano KP; Taylor MS; Felix BA; Hamber EA; Daniels AU; Heller J
    J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(2):145-6. PubMed ID: 7640442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of in vitro bacterial bioluminescence and tissue culture bioassays and in vivo tests for evaluating acute toxicity of biomaterials.
    Burton SA; Petersen RV; Dickman SN; Nelson JR
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1986; 20(6):827-38. PubMed ID: 3722217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of the luminescent bacterial system for the rapid assessment of aquatic toxicity.
    Bulich AA; Isenberg DL
    ISA Trans; 1981; 20(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 7251338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Separation of pH, dilution, ionic strength and chemical matrix effects for biological monitoring of urines with the Microtox test using nicotine, cotinine and reference urines.
    Chou CC; Hee SS
    J Biolumin Chemilumin; 1993; 8(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 8475782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A trial to compare the effects of pH, buffer concentration, and NaCl, on one fluorescent and two bioluminescent bacterial tests for acute toxicity.
    Mariscal A; Carnero M; Gómez-Aracena J; Fernández-Crehuet J
    Microbios; 1997; 92(370):35-45. PubMed ID: 9569662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microtox solid phase test: Effect of diluent used in toxicity test.
    Volpi Ghirardini A; Girardini M; Marchetto D; Pantani C
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Mar; 72(3):851-61. PubMed ID: 18471876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bioluminescent monitoring of detoxification processes: activity of humic substances in quinone solutions.
    Fedorova E; Kudryasheva N; Kuznetsov A; Mogil'naya O; Stom D
    J Photochem Photobiol B; 2007 Sep; 88(2-3):131-6. PubMed ID: 17716903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biocompatibility of electrochemically activated aqueous solutions: an animal study.
    Marais JT
    SADJ; 2002 Jan; 57(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 11901580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Biotests for mineral waters with natural and recombinant luminescent microorganisms].
    Deriabin DG; Aleshina ES
    Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol; 2008; 44(4):417-21. PubMed ID: 18924408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cytotoxicity evaluation of ceramic particles of different sizes and shapes.
    Yamamoto A; Honma R; Sumita M; Hanawa T
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Feb; 68(2):244-56. PubMed ID: 14704966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro and in vivo (cyto)toxicity assays using PVC and LDPE as model materials.
    Van Tienhoven EA; Korbee D; Schipper L; Verharen HW; De Jong WH
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Jul; 78(1):175-82. PubMed ID: 16628708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The cytotoxicity of orthodontic metal bracket immersion media.
    Kao CT; Ding SJ; Min Y; Hsu TC; Chou MY; Huang TH
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 17311801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of low-level alpha-radiation on bioluminescent assay systems of various complexity.
    Rozhko TV; Kudryasheva NS; Kuznetsov AM; Vydryakova GA; Bondareva LG; Bolsunovsky AY
    Photochem Photobiol Sci; 2007 Jan; 6(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 17200739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The sensitivity of various in-vitro-test systems in biological testing of materials].
    Schmalz G
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1977 Nov; 32(11):878-9. PubMed ID: 270399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Methodological errors in the use of biological testing in hygienic studies].
    Krasovskiĭ GN; Egorova NA
    Gig Sanit; 2000; (4):63-6. PubMed ID: 10975204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chemical speciation and toxicity of metals assessed by three bioluminescence-based assays using marine organisms.
    Deheyn DD; Bencheikh-Latmani R; Latz MI
    Environ Toxicol; 2004 Jun; 19(3):161-78. PubMed ID: 15101032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Study on correlation between in vivo and in vitro tests of biomaterials--correlation between leukocyte chemotaxis test and muscular implant test in rabbits].
    Wen X; Zhang C; Liu X; Gu G; Qian Y; Meng A; Huang Z
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Sep; 16(3):263-6, 287. PubMed ID: 12552740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bioluminescence intensity difference observed in luminous bacteria groups with different motility.
    Sasaki S; Okamoto T; Fujii T
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2009 Mar; 48(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 19207857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of bioluminescent dinoflagellates as an environmental risk assessment tool.
    Lapota D; Osorio AR; Liao C; Bjorndal B
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2007 Dec; 54(12):1857-67. PubMed ID: 17928009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Biological compatibility of oral implants].
    Pizzoferrato A; Vespucci A; Ciapetti G; Stea S
    Minerva Stomatol; 1986 Mar; 35(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 3457256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.