These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7640924)

  • 1. A randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial of iomeprol, iohexol and iopamidol in intravenous urography.
    Harding JR; Bertazzoli M; Spinazzi A
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Jul; 68(811):712-5. PubMed ID: 7640924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomised, double-blind trial of iomeprol and iopromide in intravenous excretory urography.
    Harding JR; Bertazzoli M; Spinazzi A
    Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S93-6. PubMed ID: 8020526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Iomeprol versus iopromide for intravenous urography.
    de Geeter P; Melchior H
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Oct; 67(802):958-63. PubMed ID: 8000839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Iomeprol versus iopamidol in contrast-enhanced computed tomography of thoracic and abdominal organs.
    Valentini AL; Tartaglione T; Monti L; Marano P
    Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S88-92. PubMed ID: 8020525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ioversol in intravenous excretory urography. Evaluation of radiographic quality, patient tolerance and safety in four clinical studies.
    Jahn H; Müller-Späth R
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1992; 35(4 Pt 2):297-302. PubMed ID: 1296496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective randomised controlled trial to determine the early and late reactions after the use of iopamidol 340 (Niopam) and iomeprol 350 (Iomeron) in cardiac catheterisation.
    Vijayalakshmi K; Kunadian B; Wright RA; Hall JA; Stewart MJ; Davies A; Sutton A; de Belder MA
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Feb; 61(2):342-50. PubMed ID: 17101256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of iopromide with iopamidol and iohexol for contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
    Goldberg SN; Abrahams J; Drayer BP; Golding S; Bernardino M; Brunetti J
    Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S76-83; discussion S93. PubMed ID: 8071050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in intravenous urography: clinical trial in 1,000 consecutive patients.
    Jacobsson BF; Jorulf H; Kalantar MS; Narasimham DL
    Radiology; 1988 Jun; 167(3):601-5. PubMed ID: 3283830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the radiographic efficacy of iomeprol.
    Kozuka T; Katayama H; Ebata K
    Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S109-14. PubMed ID: 8020512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Double-blind study of the safety, tolerance, and diagnostic efficacy of iopromide as compared with iopamidol and iohexol in patients requiring aortography and visceral angiography.
    Faykus MH; Cope C; Athanasoulis C; Druy EM; Hedgcock M; Miller FJ; Bron K
    Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S98-101; discussion S106. PubMed ID: 8071053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peripheral arteriography with a new nonionic agent: comparison of iomeprol with iopamidol.
    Ugolotti U; Larini P; Marcato C; Cusmano F; Puccianti F
    Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S77-82. PubMed ID: 8020523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Iomeprol and iopamidol in cardiac angiography: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group comparison.
    Fattori R; Piva R; Schicchi F; Pancrazi A; Gabrielli G; Marzocchi A; Piovaccari G; Blandini A; Magnani B
    Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S61-6. PubMed ID: 8020520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Iomeprol: current and future profile of a radiocontrast agent.
    Katayama H; Spinazzi A; Fouillet X; Kirchin MA; Taroni P; Davies A
    Invest Radiol; 2001 Feb; 36(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 11224756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical experience with iomeprol in myelography and myelo-CT: clinical pharmacology and double-blind comparisons with iopamidol, iohexol, and iotrolan.
    Katayama H; Heneine N; van Gessel R; Taroni P; Spinazzi A
    Invest Radiol; 2001 Jan; 36(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 11176258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy and safety of iopromide for excretory urography.
    Newhouse JH; Landman J; Lang E; Amis ES; Goldman S; Khazan R; Leder R; Hedgcock M
    Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S68-73. PubMed ID: 8071049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Quality control in urography with iopamidol and iohexol. A parallel comparison].
    Stacul F; Bazzocchi M; Zanella F; Abbona M; Ukovich W
    Radiol Med; 1987 Mar; 73(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 3562919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Image quality and safety after iodixanol in intravenous urography; a comparison with iohexol.
    Sundgren PC; Bååth L; Törnquist C; Hougens Grynne B; Kjaersgaard P; Almén T
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Aug; 69(824):699-703. PubMed ID: 8949670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical tolerance and diagnostic efficacy of iobitridol 300 in lower limb angiography.
    Stockx L; Wilms G; Baert AL; Terrier F
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():72-4. PubMed ID: 8619357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the clinical safety and efficacy of iobitridol (Xenetix) in intravenous urography.
    Fournier PJ; Steinbrich W; Freitag P; Voegeli E
    Eur J Radiol; 1996 Nov; 23(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 9003922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acute adverse reactions to iopromide vs iomeprol: a retrospective analysis of spontaneous reporting from a radiology department.
    García M; Aguirre U; Martinez A; Ruiz B; Lertxundi U; Aguirre C
    Br J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 87(1033):20130511. PubMed ID: 24191124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.