These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7640932)

  • 1. Mammography in the follow-up after breast-conserving treatment in cancer of the breast: suitability for mammographic interpretation, validity and interobserver variation.
    Jager JJ; Langendijk JA; Dohmen JP; Schreutelkamp IL; Volovics L; van Engelshoven JM; de Jong JM; Schouten LJ; Hupperets PS; Blijham GH
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Jul; 68(811):754-60. PubMed ID: 7640932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does surgical closure technique affect early mammographic detection of tumor recurrence after breast-conserving therapy?
    Newlin HE; Indelicato DJ; Abbitt P; Marshall J; Wymer D; Grobmyer S; Haigh L; Copeland E; Morris CG; Mendenhall NP
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2009 Oct; 32(5):499-503. PubMed ID: 19528792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of chemotherapy on the mammographic appearance of breast cancer and correlation with histopathology.
    Mistry KA; Thakur MH; Kembhavi SA
    Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1057):20150479. PubMed ID: 26495873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interobserver variation in the interpretation of breast imaging. Comparison of mammography, ultrasonography, and both combined in the interpretation of palpable noncalcified breast masses.
    Skaane P; Engedal K; Skjennald A
    Acta Radiol; 1997 Jul; 38(4 Pt 1):497-502. PubMed ID: 9240666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is grading of breast fibrosis with mammography feasible?
    Hoeller U; Grzyska B; Lorenzen J; Kuhlmey A; Alberti W; Adam G
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 May; 181(5):307-12. PubMed ID: 15900426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications.
    Jiang Y; Nishikawa RM; Schmidt RA; Toledano AY; Doi K
    Radiology; 2001 Sep; 220(3):787-94. PubMed ID: 11526283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists.
    Barlow WE; Chi C; Carney PA; Taplin SH; D'Orsi C; Cutter G; Hendrick RE; Elmore JG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1840-50. PubMed ID: 15601640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between findings on pre-treatment mammograms and local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy for invasive breast cancer.
    Voogd AC; van der Horst F; Crommelin MA; Peterse JL; van Beek MW; Repelaer van Driel OJ; van der Heijden LH; Coebergh JW
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 1999 Jun; 25(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 10336807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The importance of mammographic screening relative to the treatment of women with carcinoma of the breast.
    Solin LJ; Legorreta A; Schultz DJ; Zatz S; Goodman RL
    Arch Intern Med; 1994 Apr; 154(7):745-52. PubMed ID: 8147678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample.
    Beam CA; Layde PM; Sullivan DC
    Arch Intern Med; 1996 Jan; 156(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 8546556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammography in patients with breast cancer treated by breast conservation (lumpectomy with or without radiation).
    Dershaw DD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):309-16. PubMed ID: 7839960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Mammographic control after quadrantectomy and radiation therapy].
    Pignatelli V; Campassi C; Calderazzi A; Colosimo S; Savino A; Grassi L; Mazzeo S
    Radiol Med; 1991 Jun; 81(6):893-8. PubMed ID: 1857799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Validity and reliability of mammographic interpretation by Mexican radiologists, using the BI-RADS system].
    Torres-Mejía G; Villaseñor-Navarro Y; Yunes-Díaz E; Angeles-Llerenas A; Martínez-Montañez OG; Lazcano-Ponce E
    Rev Invest Clin; 2011; 63(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 21717719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms.
    Elmore JG; Wells CK; Lee CH; Howard DH; Feinstein AR
    N Engl J Med; 1994 Dec; 331(22):1493-9. PubMed ID: 7969300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do structural changes in the tumour bed after intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) of breast cancer complicate the evaluation of mammograms in a long-term follow-up?
    Wasser K; Ruch M; Brade J; Schoeber C; Kraus-Tiefenbacher U; Schnitzer A; Engel D; Wenz F; Sütterlin M; Schoenberg SO; Buesing KA
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):e255-9. PubMed ID: 21376493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammography: interobserver variability in breast density assessment.
    Ooms EA; Zonderland HM; Eijkemans MJ; Kriege M; Mahdavian Delavary B; Burger CW; Ansink AC
    Breast; 2007 Dec; 16(6):568-76. PubMed ID: 18035541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the postoperative breast.
    Mendelson EB
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):107-38. PubMed ID: 1732922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interexamination variation of whole breast ultrasound.
    Bosch AM; Kessels AG; Beets GL; Vranken KL; Borstlap AC; Von Meyenfeldt MF; van Engelshoven JM
    Br J Radiol; 2003 May; 76(905):328-31. PubMed ID: 12763948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of screening mammography using single versus independent double interpretation.
    Taplin SH; Rutter CM; Elmore JG; Seger D; White D; Brenner RJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 May; 174(5):1257-62. PubMed ID: 10789773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.