These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7641015)

  • 1. Analysis of residual cancer after diagnostic breast biopsy: an argument for fine-needle aspiration cytology.
    Cox CE; Reintgen DS; Nicosia SV; Ku NN; Baekey P; Carey LC
    Ann Surg Oncol; 1995 May; 2(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 7641015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer.
    Tartter PI; Kaplan J; Bleiweiss I; Gajdos C; Kong A; Ahmed S; Zapetti D
    Am J Surg; 2000 Feb; 179(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 10773138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re-excision operations in nonpalpable breast cancer.
    Mokbel K; Ahmed M; Nash A; Sacks N
    J Surg Oncol; 1995 Apr; 58(4):225-8; discussion 229-32. PubMed ID: 7723365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
    Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Local recurrence of breast cancer after cytological evaluation of lumpectomy margins.
    Cox CE; Pendas S; Ku NN; Reintgen DS; Greenberg HS; Nicosia SV
    Am Surg; 1998 Jun; 64(6):533-7; discussion 537-8. PubMed ID: 9619174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determinants of positive histologic margins and residual tumor after lumpectomy for early breast cancer: a prospective study with special reference to touch preparation cytology.
    Saarela AO; Paloneva TK; Rissanen TJ; Kiviniemi HO
    J Surg Oncol; 1997 Dec; 66(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 9425328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fine-needle aspiration of clinically suspicious palpable breast masses with histopathologic correlation.
    Ariga R; Bloom K; Reddy VB; Kluskens L; Francescatti D; Dowlat K; Siziopikou P; Gattuso P
    Am J Surg; 2002 Nov; 184(5):410-3. PubMed ID: 12433603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fine needle aspiration cytology in lieu of open biopsy in management of primary breast cancer.
    Wanebo HJ; Feldman PS; Wilhelm MC; Covell JL; Binns RL
    Ann Surg; 1984 May; 199(5):569-79. PubMed ID: 6721606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammographically detected breast cancer. Nonpalpable is not a synonym for inconsequential.
    Schwartz GF; Carter DL; Conant EF; Gannon FH; Finkel GC; Feig SA
    Cancer; 1994 Mar; 73(6):1660-5. PubMed ID: 8156493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities.
    Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Ljung BM; Grady D
    Ann Intern Med; 2003 Aug; 139(4):274-84. PubMed ID: 12965983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer.
    Smitt MC; Horst K
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1040-4. PubMed ID: 17203329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Close/positive margins after breast-conserving therapy: additional resection or no resection?
    Wood WC
    Breast; 2013 Aug; 22 Suppl 2():S115-7. PubMed ID: 24074771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrospective analysis of sentinel node localization in multifocal, multicentric, palpable, or nonpalpable breast cancer.
    Kumar R; Jana S; Heiba SI; Dakhel M; Axelrod D; Siegel B; Bernik S; Mills C; Wallack M; Abdel-Dayem HM
    J Nucl Med; 2003 Jan; 44(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 12515869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of fine needle aspiration for solid breast lesions is accurate and cost-effective.
    Rubin M; Horiuchi K; Joy N; Haun W; Read R; Ratzer E; Fenoglio M
    Am J Surg; 1997 Dec; 174(6):694-6; discussion 697-8. PubMed ID: 9409599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonimage-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of palpable axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients.
    Marti JL; Ayo D; Levine P; Hernandez O; Rescigno J; Axelrod DM
    Breast J; 2012; 18(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 22098412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinically occult breast carcinoma: diagnostic approaches and role of axillary node dissection.
    Meterissian S; Fornage BD; Singletary SE
    Ann Surg Oncol; 1995 Jul; 2(4):314-8. PubMed ID: 7552620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fine-needle aspiration in the management of breast masses.
    Layfield LJ; Glasgow BJ; Cramer H
    Pathol Annu; 1989; 24 Pt 2():23-62. PubMed ID: 2671883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Stereotactic tumor biopsy and tumor excision].
    Winzer KJ; Filimonow S; Guski H; Hamm B; Müller JM
    Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1998; 115():374-8. PubMed ID: 9931644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology from breast masses in Thailand.
    Nguansangiam S; Jesdapatarakul S; Tangjitgamol S
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2009; 10(4):623-6. PubMed ID: 19827882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of reexcision on the success of breast-conserving surgery.
    Kearney TJ; Morrow M
    Ann Surg Oncol; 1995 Jul; 2(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 7552618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.