BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7641088)

  • 1. Urea kinetic modeling at high urea clearances: implications for clinical practice.
    Abramson F; Gibson S; Barlee V; Bosch JP
    Adv Ren Replace Ther; 1994 Apr; 1(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 7641088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rebound kinetics of beta2-microglobulin after hemodialysis.
    Leypoldt JK; Cheung AK; Deeter RB
    Kidney Int; 1999 Oct; 56(4):1571-7. PubMed ID: 10504510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Urea as a marker of adequacy in hemodialysis: lesson from in vivo urea dynamics monitoring.
    Canaud B; Bosc JY; Cabrol L; Leray-Moragues H; Navino C; Verzetti G; Thomaseth K
    Kidney Int Suppl; 2000 Aug; 76():S28-40. PubMed ID: 10936797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Kinetics of urea and beta-microglobulin during and after short hemodialysis treatments.
    Leypoldt JK; Cheung AK; Deeter RB; Goldfarb-Rumyantzev A; Greene T; Depner TA; Kusek J
    Kidney Int; 2004 Oct; 66(4):1669-76. PubMed ID: 15458465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Urea kinetics during sustained low-efficiency dialysis in critically ill patients requiring renal replacement therapy.
    Marshall MR; Golper TA; Shaver MJ; Alam MG; Chatoth DK
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2002 Mar; 39(3):556-70. PubMed ID: 11877575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of different methods to estimate urea distribution volume and generation rate.
    Cappello A; Grandi F; Lamberti C; Santoro A
    Int J Artif Organs; 1994 Jun; 17(6):322-30. PubMed ID: 7806417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new Bayesian method to forecast and fine tune individual hemodialysis dose.
    Pfister M; Uehlinger DE; Hung AM; Schaedeli F; Sheiner LB
    Hemodial Int; 2004 Jul; 8(3):244-56. PubMed ID: 19379424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abbreviated two sample, single pool, variable volume urea kinetic modeling.
    Dumler F; Bello MJ
    ASAIO J; 1995; 41(3):M795-7. PubMed ID: 8573917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Update on Postdialysis Rebound by a New Technology in Hemodialysis.
    Testal AG; Marín DH; Maset RG; Maicas PR; Salvador ISR; Díaz PO; Najera JEF; De Juan ET; Carrera CB
    Ther Apher Dial; 2017 Oct; 21(5):473-477. PubMed ID: 28795535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors affecting survival of hemodialysis patients utilizing urea kinetic modeling. A critical appraisal of shortening dialysis times.
    Capelli JP; Kushner H; Camiscioli T; Chen SM; Stuccio-White NM
    Am J Nephrol; 1992; 12(4):212-23. PubMed ID: 1481868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prescribing hemodialysis using a weekly urea mass balance model.
    Leypoldt JK; Kablitz C; Gregory MC; Senekjian HO; Cheung AK
    Blood Purif; 1991; 9(5-6):271-84. PubMed ID: 1819316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eliminating the need for routine monthly postdialysis serum urea nitrogen measurement: A method for monitoring Kt/V and normalized protein catabolic rate using conductivity determined dialyzer clearance.
    Daugirdas JT
    Semin Dial; 2018 Nov; 31(6):633-636. PubMed ID: 30311270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Creatinine generation from kinetic modeling with or without postdialysis serum creatinine measurement: results from the HEMO study.
    Daugirdas JT; Depner TA
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2017 Nov; 32(11):1926-1933. PubMed ID: 28379486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of methods to predict equilibrated Kt/V in the HEMO Pilot Study.
    Daugirdas JT; Depner TA; Gotch FA; Greene T; Keshaviah P; Levin NW; Schulman G
    Kidney Int; 1997 Nov; 52(5):1395-405. PubMed ID: 9350665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of kinetic parameters for urea in end-stage renal disease patients using a two-compartment model.
    Pearson P; Lew S; Abramson F; Bosch J
    J Am Soc Nephrol; 1994 May; 4(11):1869-73. PubMed ID: 7919136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Estimation of the dialysis time based on a simplified algorithm for urea kinetics].
    Pietrzyk JA
    Przegl Lek; 1992; 49(5):145-50. PubMed ID: 1438916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Solute solver 'what if' module for modeling urea kinetics.
    Daugirdas JT
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2016 Nov; 31(11):1934-1937. PubMed ID: 27587603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of a modified urea kinetic model direct dialysis quantification and classic urea kinetic modeling.
    Bosticardo GM; Avalle U; Giacchino F; Alloatti S
    ASAIO J; 1995; 41(3):M798-800. PubMed ID: 8573918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemodialysis urea rebound: the effect of increasing dialysis efficiency.
    Spiegel DM; Baker PL; Babcock S; Contiguglia R; Klein M
    Am J Kidney Dis; 1995 Jan; 25(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 7810527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Kinetics of beta2-microglobulin and phosphate during hemodialysis: effects of treatment frequency and duration.
    Leypoldt JK
    Semin Dial; 2005; 18(5):401-8. PubMed ID: 16191181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.