These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Optical measurements of transmembrane potential changes during electric field stimulation of ventricular cells. Knisley SB; Blitchington TF; Hill BC; Grant AO; Smith WM; Pilkington TC; Ideker RE Circ Res; 1993 Feb; 72(2):255-70. PubMed ID: 8418982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Responses of the transmembrane potential of myocardial cells during a shock. Zhou X; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1995 Apr; 6(4):252-63. PubMed ID: 7647950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transmembrane potential changes caused by shocks in guinea pig papillary muscle. Zhou X; Smith WM; Rollins DL; Ideker RE Am J Physiol; 1996 Dec; 271(6 Pt 2):H2536-46. PubMed ID: 8997315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of intramural virtual electrodes in shock-induced activation of left ventricle: optical measurements from the intact epicardial surface. Sharifov OF; Fast VG Heart Rhythm; 2006 Sep; 3(9):1063-73. PubMed ID: 16945803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transmembrane voltage changes produced by real and virtual electrodes during monophasic defibrillation shock delivered by an implantable electrode. Efimov IR; Cheng YN; Biermann M; Van Wagoner DR; Mazgalev TN; Tchou PJ J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 8(9):1031-45. PubMed ID: 9300301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transmembrane voltage changes during unipolar stimulation of rabbit ventricle. Knisley SB Circ Res; 1995 Dec; 77(6):1229-39. PubMed ID: 7586236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Direct measurements of membrane time constant during defibrillation strength shocks. Sharma V; Qu F; Nikolski VP; DeGroot P; Efimov IR Heart Rhythm; 2007 Apr; 4(4):478-86. PubMed ID: 17399638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transmembrane potentials during high voltage shocks in ischemic cardiac tissue. Holley LK; Knisley SB Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jan; 20(1 Pt 2):146-52. PubMed ID: 9121979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Polarity reversal lowers activation time during diastolic field stimulation of the rabbit ventricles: insights into mechanisms. Maleckar MM; Woods MC; Sidorov VY; Holcomb MR; Mashburn DN; Wikswo JP; Trayanova NA Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2008 Oct; 295(4):H1626-33. PubMed ID: 18708441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optical recordings in the rabbit heart show that defibrillation strength shocks prolong the duration of depolarization and the refractory period. Dillon SM Circ Res; 1991 Sep; 69(3):842-56. PubMed ID: 1873877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optical recordings of the effect of electrical stimulation on action potential repolarization and the induction of reentry in two-dimensional perfused rabbit epicardium. Knisley SB; Hill BC Circulation; 1993 Nov; 88(5 Pt 1):2402-14. PubMed ID: 8222133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of shock-induced changes in transmembrane potential on reentrant waves and outcome during cardioversion of isolated rabbit hearts. Evans FG; Ideker RE; Gray RA J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2002 Nov; 13(11):1118-27. PubMed ID: 12475103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Atria are more susceptible to electroporation than ventricles: implications for atrial stunning, shock-induced arrhythmia and defibrillation failure. Fedorov VV; Kostecki G; Hemphill M; Efimov IR Heart Rhythm; 2008 Apr; 5(4):593-604. PubMed ID: 18362029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of electroporation on optically recorded transmembrane potential responses to high-intensity electrical shocks. Nikolski VP; Sambelashvili AT; Krinsky VI; Efimov IR Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2004 Jan; 286(1):H412-8. PubMed ID: 14527941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Induction of ventricular fibrillation by T-wave field-shocks in the isolated perfused rabbit heart: role of nonuniform shock responses. Kirchhof PF; Fabritz CL; Behrens S; Franz MR Basic Res Cardiol; 1997 Feb; 92(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 9062650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The mechanisms of the vulnerable window: the role of virtual electrodes and shock polarity. Yamanouchi Y; Cheng Y; Tchou PJ; Efimov IR Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 2001 Jan; 79(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 11201498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Arrhythmogenic changes in action potential configuration in the ventricle induced by DC shocks. Kodama I; Sakuma I; Shibata N; Honjo H; Toyama J J Electrocardiol; 1999; 32 Suppl():92-9. PubMed ID: 10688309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]