These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7641922)
1. A randomized prospective comparison between intrauterine insemination and fallopian sperm perfusion for the treatment of infertility. Karande VC; Rao R; Pratt DE; Balin M; Levrant S; Morris R; Dudkeiwicz A; Gleicher N Fertil Steril; 1995 Sep; 64(3):638-40. PubMed ID: 7641922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new system for fallopian tube sperm perfusion leads to pregnancy rates twice as high as standard intrauterine insemination. Fanchin R; Olivennes F; Righini C; Hazout A; Schwab B; Frydman R Fertil Steril; 1995 Sep; 64(3):505-10. PubMed ID: 7641902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A simple method for fallopian tube sperm perfusion using a blocking device in the treatment of unexplained infertility. Ricci G; Nucera G; Pozzobon C; Boscolo R; Giolo E; Guaschino S Fertil Steril; 2001 Dec; 76(6):1242-8. PubMed ID: 11730758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of fallopian tube sperm perfusion with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. Nuojua-Huttunen S; Tuomivaara L; Juntunen K; Tomás C; Martikainen H Fertil Steril; 1997 May; 67(5):939-42. PubMed ID: 9130904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fallopian sperm perfusion versus intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled trial and metaanalysis of the literature. Trout SW; Kemmann E Fertil Steril; 1999 May; 71(5):881-5. PubMed ID: 10231050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion versus intrauterine insemination in unexplained infertility: a randomized, prospective, cross-over trial. Biacchiardi CP; Revelli A; Gennarelli G; Rustichelli S; Moffa F; Massobrio M Fertil Steril; 2004 Feb; 81(2):448-51. PubMed ID: 14967388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin versus clomiphene citrate in subfertile couples treated with intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled trial. Peeraer K; Debrock S; De Loecker P; Tomassetti C; Laenen A; Welkenhuysen M; Meeuwis L; Pelckmans S; Mol BW; Spiessens C; De Neubourg D; D'Hooghe TM Hum Reprod; 2015 May; 30(5):1079-88. PubMed ID: 25788569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion in non-tubal infertility. Shekhawat GS Med J Armed Forces India; 2012 Jul; 68(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 24532873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Questioning the efficacy of Fallopian tube sperm perfusion. El Sadek MM; Amer MK; Abdel-Malak G Hum Reprod; 1998 Nov; 13(11):3053-6. PubMed ID: 9853855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP) versus intra-uterine insemination (IUI) in the treatment of unexplained infertility: a prospective randomized study. Kahn JA; Sunde A; Koskemies A; von Düring V; Sørdal T; Christensen F; Molne K Hum Reprod; 1993 Jun; 8(6):890-4. PubMed ID: 8345080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion has no advantage over intra-uterine insemination when used in combination with ovarian stimulation for the treatment of unexplained infertility. Gregoriou O; Pyrgiotis E; Konidaris S; Papadias C; Zourlas PA Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1995; 39(4):226-8. PubMed ID: 7635364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. No difference in cycle pregnancy rate and in cumulative live-birth rate between women with surgically treated minimal to mild endometriosis and women with unexplained infertility after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. Werbrouck E; Spiessens C; Meuleman C; D'Hooghe T Fertil Steril; 2006 Sep; 86(3):566-71. PubMed ID: 16952506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The pregnancy rates with intrauterine insemination (IUI) in superovulated cycles employing different protocols (clomiphen citrate (CC), human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) and HMG+CC) and in natural ovulatory cycle. Mahani IM; Afnan M J Pak Med Assoc; 2004 Oct; 54(10):503-5. PubMed ID: 15552282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gamete intra-fallopian transfer or intrauterine insemination after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for treatment of infertility due to endometriosis. Lodhi S; Abdel Fattah A; Abozaid T; Murphy J; Formantini E; Sasy M; Barber K; Abuzeid M Gynecol Endocrinol; 2004 Sep; 19(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 15697077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of treatment with ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination in women with unilateral tubal occlusion diagnosed by hysterosalpingography. Farhi J; Ben-Haroush A; Lande Y; Fisch B Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):396-400. PubMed ID: 17445812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intrauterine insemination after ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate: predictive potential of inseminating motile count and sperm morphology. Ombelet W; Vandeput H; Van de Putte G; Cox A; Janssen M; Jacobs P; Bosmans E; Steeno O; Kruger T Hum Reprod; 1997 Jul; 12(7):1458-63. PubMed ID: 9262278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of time intervals from the end of sperm collection to intrauterine insemination on the pregnancy rates in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation-intrauterine insemination cycles. Kuru Pekcan M; Kokanalı D; Kokanalı K; Taşçı Y J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Dec; 47(10):561-564. PubMed ID: 30170131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recombinant FSH increases live birth rates as compared to clomiphene citrate in intrauterine insemination cycles in couples with subfertility: a prospective randomized study. Erdem M; Abay S; Erdem A; Firat Mutlu M; Nas E; Mutlu I; Oktem M Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Jun; 189():33-7. PubMed ID: 25855325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]