110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7642069)
1. [Current phase of transformation of our health system].
Bobbio M
G Ital Cardiol; 1995 May; 25(5):649-50. PubMed ID: 7642069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost effectiveness, quality seen as goals for technology in DRG system.
Olseth DR; Sutherland DC; Miller G
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1984; 17(3):23-5. PubMed ID: 10310590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medicare home health reimbursement alternatives: access, quality, and cost incentives.
Schlenker RE; Shaughnessy PW
Home Health Care Serv Q; 1992; 13(1-2):91-115. PubMed ID: 10126434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Majority of hospitals consider DRG 104 to be a moneymaker.
Carter K
Mod Healthc; 1986 Feb; 16(4):84. PubMed ID: 10317679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The prospective payment alternative.
Haug JN; Chupack NK
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1983 Apr; 68(4):9-14. PubMed ID: 10309903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality of care--physician's beacon.
Smith DA
Pa Med; 1986 Apr; 89(4):10. PubMed ID: 3085051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of prospective reimbursement on trauma patients.
Jacobs LM
Conn Med; 1985 Oct; 49(10):662-6. PubMed ID: 3933904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Cardiology in the DRG system, 2008].
Siebers L; Reinecke H; Bunzemeier H; Roeder N
Med Klin (Munich); 2008 Feb; 103(2):113-4. PubMed ID: 18270668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Baring costs. How the DRG system works.
Kotelchuck R
Health PAC Bull; 1984; 15(2):7-12. PubMed ID: 10310617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Critical appraisal of the DRG system. Problem areas for DRG reimbursement in the U.S.A.
Harper DL
Aust Health Rev; 1985; 8(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 10311188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective payment and malpractice: can higher quality be consistent with lower costs?
Braganza KE; Simmons LP
Mich Hosp; 1983 Dec; 19(12):9-13. PubMed ID: 10310329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Pilot trial of the Diagnosis Related Group and Prospective Payment System (DRG-PPS) in japan. No. 14, in series of articles: controversy and reform proposals concerning insured medical care in neurosurgery].
Sakurai RY
No Shinkei Geka; 2003 Mar; 31(3):339-42. PubMed ID: 12688248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The DRG challenge is to ensure quality.
Heinz J
Provider; 1986 Jun; 12(6):11-2. PubMed ID: 10311563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective payment to encourage system wide quality improvement.
McNair P; Borovnicar D; Jackson T; Gillett S
Med Care; 2009 Mar; 47(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 19194336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Legislative currents: Prospective Payment Assessment Commission (ProPAC).
Cofer J
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1985 Mar; 56(3):28. PubMed ID: 10311082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. PPS and quality care: can they coexist?
Vladeck BC
Healthspan; 1986 Jan; 3(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 10311449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploring home health care opportunities as a result of the prospective payment system.
Johnson KA
Caring; 1985 Apr; 4(4):54-60. PubMed ID: 10311065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Perspectives. DRGs and quality of care.
Wash Rep Med Health; 1985 Nov; 39(46):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10311364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Payment mechanisms, nonprice incentives, and organizational innovation in health care.
Robinson JC
Inquiry; 1993; 30(3):328-33. PubMed ID: 8406788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lawmakers focus on hospital-DRG squeeze.
Baldwin MF
Mod Healthc; 1985 Mar; 15(7):54-8. PubMed ID: 10311030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
