153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7642781)
1. Mandated life versus mandatory death: New York's disgraceful partner notification record.
Norwood C
J Community Health; 1995 Apr; 20(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 7642781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Protecting the weakest link: a proposal for universal, unblinded pediatric HIV testing, counselling and treatment.
Crawford C
J Community Health; 1995 Apr; 20(2):125-41. PubMed ID: 7642779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New York's partner notification rules to be ready soon.
AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Mar; 14(5):2. PubMed ID: 11366449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The case against mandatory newborn screening for HIV antibodies.
Dumois AO
J Community Health; 1995 Apr; 20(2):143-59. PubMed ID: 7642780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Congress begins discussions on partner notification bill.
AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Oct; 13(19):1, 6-7. PubMed ID: 11365941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New York governor signs bill to track HIV cases by name.
AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Jul; 13(13):1-2. PubMed ID: 11365575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. It's the law. What is?
Body Posit; 1999 Mar; 12(3):20-1. PubMed ID: 11366291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Named reporting and mandatory partner notification in New York State: the effect on consent for perinatal HIV testing.
Dolbear GL; Wojtowycz M; Newell LT
J Urban Health; 2002 Jun; 79(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 12023499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lawmakers introduce bill for name-based notification.
AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Aug; 13(15):10-1. PubMed ID: 11365674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New York issues draft rules for notification, surveillance.
AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Apr; 14(6):1, 6-7. PubMed ID: 11366626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Name-based notification bill sails through New York Senate.
AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Jun; 13(12):1, 6. PubMed ID: 11365514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What's in a name?
Millman S
Body Posit; 1999 Jan; 12(1):10-5, 17. PubMed ID: 11366102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of name-based reporting and partner notification on HIV testing in New York State.
Tesoriero JM; Battles HB; Heavner K; Leung SY; Nemeth C; Pulver W; Birkhead GS
Am J Public Health; 2008 Apr; 98(4):728-35. PubMed ID: 18356570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New York panel backs HIV reporting using coded identifiers.
AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Apr; 13(7):1, 12-3. PubMed ID: 11365300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Re: "Named reporting and mandatory partner notification in New York State: the effect on consent for perinatal HIV testing".
Birkhead GS; Tesoriero J; Warren B; Wade N
J Urban Health; 2003 Mar; 80(1):167-8; author reply 169-70. PubMed ID: 12612106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. ACLU says mandatory partner notification doesn't work. American Civil Liberties Union.
AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Apr; 13(7):13. PubMed ID: 11365302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consent for prenatal testing: a preliminary examination of the effects of named HIV reporting and mandatory partner notification.
Dolbear GL; Newell LT
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2002 May; 8(3):69-72. PubMed ID: 15156627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New York panel is split over HIV case surveillance.
AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Feb; 13(2):1, 6-7. PubMed ID: 11365057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. HIV Prevention Act would require HIV reporting.
AIDS Alert; 1997 May; 12(5):54-5. PubMed ID: 11364221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The name game: issues surrounding New York state's HIV partner notification law.
Salmon S
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 2000; 16(3):959-91. PubMed ID: 12645596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
