151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7642885)
1. Junk science--is peer review the answer?
Brumback RA
J Child Neurol; 1995 May; 10(3):175-6. PubMed ID: 7642885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review of medical expert witnesses.
McAbee GN
J Child Neurol; 1994 Apr; 9(2):216-7. PubMed ID: 8006378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Paladin problem.
Short GF
J Child Neurol; 1994 Apr; 9(2):213-5. PubMed ID: 8006377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Peer review of the expert witness: an opportunity to improve our medical liability system.
Fadjo D; Bucciarelli RL
J Child Neurol; 1995 Sep; 10(5):403-4. PubMed ID: 7499761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Peer review of expert medical-legal testimony: a proposal for child neurology.
Shields WD
J Child Neurol; 1992 Jul; 7(3):237-9. PubMed ID: 1634744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Expert witness testimony: a time for self-regulation?
Weintraub MI
J Child Neurol; 1995 May; 10(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 7642905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The essential and ethical expert: serving as a medical expert witness in the 21st century.
Ward NO
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Jan; 136(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 17210323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Expert witness testimony: An update.
Weintraub MI
Neurol Clin; 1999 May; 17(2):363-9. PubMed ID: 10196417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improper expert medical testimony. Existing and proposed mechanisms of oversight.
McAbee GN
J Leg Med; 1998 Jun; 19(2):257-72. PubMed ID: 9658741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review where it counts.
Bryan CS
J S C Med Assoc; 1989 Apr; 85(4):209-11. PubMed ID: 2709821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The medical expert witness: legal and ethical issues.
Hirsch P
Clin Dermatol; 2010 Mar; 28(2):240-2. PubMed ID: 20347668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. "Junk science" and the legal system.
McFadden J
Pa Dent J (Harrisb); 1998; 65(3):5. PubMed ID: 14621505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Marketplace. AMA sets campaign to punish doctors who base testimony on 'junk science'.
Moskowitz DB
Med Health; 1998 Nov; 52(46):suppl 1-2. PubMed ID: 10187178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. 1986 liability reforms--a synopsis.
Luchtel KE
Iowa Med; 1986 Dec; 76(12):558-61, 564. PubMed ID: 3804665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical consultation and expert testimony in claims litigation. Professional and ethical guidelines.
Roberts HJ
J Insur Med; 1991; 23(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 10148473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medicine on trial. Physicians' attitudes about expert medical witnesses.
Eitel DR; Hegeman RJ; Evans ER
J Leg Med; 1997 Sep; 18(3):345-60. PubMed ID: 9394925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Task force 5: Expert testimony and opinions.
Bonow RO; Zipes DP; Anderson JL; Cheitlin MD; Goldstein LB; Grant AO; Faxon D; Lima JA; Robertson RM
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Oct; 44(8):1747-9. PubMed ID: 15489119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Improper medical practices and expert testimony in medical responsibility].
Develay-Le Gueut M; Penneau M
Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege); 1986; 36(2):24-7. PubMed ID: 2979370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Is "junk science" finally on the way out?
Crane M
Med Econ; 1996 Apr; 73(8):59-61, 65-6. PubMed ID: 10157438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The dilemma of the expert witness.
Gorney M
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 May; 121(5):1845-1846. PubMed ID: 18454010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
