BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7642885)

  • 41. Improving the quality of expert witness testimony.
    Brent RL
    Pediatrics; 1988 Sep; 82(3 Pt 2):511-3. PubMed ID: 3405689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Expert witness testimony.
    Amon E
    Clin Perinatol; 2007 Sep; 34(3):473-88. PubMed ID: 17765495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Expert testimony: use and abuse.
    Slovenko R
    Med Law; 1993; 12(6-8):627-41. PubMed ID: 8183070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Liability of the expert witness].
    Jansen C
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):632-5. PubMed ID: 9064937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The expert witness: some observations and a response from neurosurgeons.
    Rovit RL; Hauber C
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1989 Jul; 74(7):10-6. PubMed ID: 10293797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Litigation, legislation, and ethics. Depositions: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
    Jerrold L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Aug; 116(2):232-4. PubMed ID: 10434098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The prima facie tort rule: a possible medical-legal answer to the medical malpractice crisis.
    Schussler T
    N Y State J Med; 1989 Jul; 89(7):399-402. PubMed ID: 2761868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. At law. Experts.
    Schneider CE
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2001; 31(4):10-1. PubMed ID: 12945461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Expert testimony: a perspective from the trenches.
    Hawkins TS
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Feb; 2(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 17411781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. What role do expert witnesses play in malpractice lawsuits?
    Hirsh BD; Wilcox DP
    Tex Med; 1992 Nov; 88(11):52-5. PubMed ID: 1488722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Observations on 35 years as an expert witness in American malpractice litigation: a comparison with the British legal system.
    Schiller NB
    Heart; 2009 May; 95(10):848-9. PubMed ID: 19401287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. "The whole truth" versus "the admissible truth": an ethics dilemma for expert witnesses.
    Gutheil TG; Hauser M; White MS; Spruiell G; Strasburger LH
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 14974796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Peer reviews. Expert opinions and unsatisfactory professional conduct.
    Taylor K
    Lamp; 1998 Aug; 55(7):19. PubMed ID: 10025358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Expert testimony.
    Griffis CA
    AANA J; 2004 Oct; 72(5):334. PubMed ID: 15529725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Expert testimony: a contrary perspective from the trenches.
    Berlin L
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Feb; 2(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 17411782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. States judge expert witnesses before they testify.
    Holthaus D
    Hospitals; 1988 Mar; 62(5):60-1. PubMed ID: 3338779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. You too can be an expert witness.
    Segal E; Sherry CJ
    Nurs Life; 1987; 7(4):38-40. PubMed ID: 3648574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The Supreme Court sets standards for engineering expert testimony.
    Richards EP; Walter C
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1999; 18(6):83-4, 88. PubMed ID: 10576079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Expert testimony in malpractice suits].
    Deutsch E
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 8588427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cancer nursing and the law. The theory of a medical malpractice case.
    Gargaro WJ
    Cancer Nurs; 1985 Dec; 8(6):341-2. PubMed ID: 3854969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.