184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7643038)
1. Interpretation of endodontic file lengths using RadioVisiography.
Leddy BJ; Miles DA; Newton CW; Brown CE
J Endod; 1994 Nov; 20(11):542-5. PubMed ID: 7643038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment: an in-vitro comparison with conventional radiography.
Shearer AC; Horner K; Wilson NH
Int Endod J; 1991 Sep; 24(5):233-9. PubMed ID: 1813427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiographic determination of canal length direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
Hedrick RT; Dove SB; Peters DD; McDavid WD
J Endod; 1994 Jul; 20(7):320-6. PubMed ID: 7996092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endodontic measurement accuracy and perceived radiograph quality: effects of film speed and density.
Sheaffer JC; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 14561969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination. Part 1. In vitro evaluation.
Ellingsen MA; Harrington GW; Hollender LG
J Endod; 1995 Jun; 21(6):326-31. PubMed ID: 7673842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of radiovisiography with radiographic film in root length determination.
Ong EY; Pitt Ford TR
Int Endod J; 1995 Jan; 28(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 7642325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of three imaging techniques for assessing endodontic working length.
Griffiths BM; Brown JE; Hyatt AT; Linney AD
Int Endod J; 1992 Nov; 25(6):279-87. PubMed ID: 1306859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination. II. In vivo evaluation.
Ellingsen MA; Hollender LG; Harrington GW
J Endod; 1995 Oct; 21(10):516-20. PubMed ID: 8596074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of radiographic and electronic working lengths.
Pratten DH; McDonald NJ
J Endod; 1996 Apr; 22(4):173-6. PubMed ID: 8935014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. The RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films.
Sanderink GC; Huiskens R; van der Stelt PF; Welander US; Stheeman SE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jul; 78(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 8078654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiographic interpretation of endodontic file length.
Cox VS; Brown CE; Bricker SL; Newton CW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Sep; 72(3):340-4. PubMed ID: 1923424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of film-based, digital, and enhanced digital images for endodontic length determination.
Woolhiser GA; Brand JW; Hoen MM; Geist JR; Pikula AA; Pink FE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 15772601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiographic and electronic diagnostic systems.
McDonald NJ
Alpha Omegan; 1991; 84(4):45-8. PubMed ID: 1819963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of several digital radiographic imaging systems for laboratory determination of endodontic file length.
Oliveira ML; Ambrosano GM; Almeida SM; Haiter-Neto F; Tosoni GM
Int Endod J; 2011 May; 44(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 21276021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of combined digital imaging parameters on endodontic file measurements.
de Oliveira ML; Pinto GC; Ambrosano GM; Tosoni GM
J Endod; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1404-7. PubMed ID: 22980188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating distances on direct digital images and conventional radiographs.
Versteeg KH; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Apr; 128(4):439-43. PubMed ID: 9103793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interpretation of periapical lesions using RadioVisioGraphy.
Yokota ET; Miles DA; Newton CW; Brown CE
J Endod; 1994 Oct; 20(10):490-4. PubMed ID: 7714421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of Ektaspeed Plus film versus Ultraspeed film for endodontic working length determination.
Brown R; Hadley JN; Chambers DW
J Endod; 1998 Jan; 24(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 9487870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiographic detection of accessory/lateral canals: use of RadioVisioGraphy and Hypaque.
Scarfe WC; Fana CR; Farman AG
J Endod; 1995 Apr; 21(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 7673818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Canal length evaluation of curved canals by direct digital or conventional radiography.
Mentes A; Gencoglu N
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Jan; 93(1):88-91. PubMed ID: 11805781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
