These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7643038)

  • 41. Radiography in endodontics.
    Bridgman JB; Campbell DJ
    N Z Dent J; 1995 Jun; 91(404):62-4. PubMed ID: 7675349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of ambient light and bit depth of digital radiograph on observer performance in determination of endodontic file positioning.
    Heo MS; Han DH; An BM; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Lee SS; Choi SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 17604662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Influence of the canal contents on the electrical assisted determination of the length of root canals.
    Pommer O; Stamm O; Attin T
    J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):83-5. PubMed ID: 11833694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A clinical evaluation of the Endocater--an electronic apex locator.
    Keller ME; Brown CE; Newton CW
    J Endod; 1991 Jun; 17(6):271-4. PubMed ID: 1940752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Linear measurements to determine working length of curved canals with fine files: conventional versus digital radiography.
    Brito-Júnior M; Santos LA; Baleeiro EN; Pêgo MM; Eleutério NB; Camilo CC
    J Oral Sci; 2009 Dec; 51(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 20032608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The electronic determination of working length.
    McDonald NJ
    Dent Clin North Am; 1992 Apr; 36(2):293-307. PubMed ID: 1572500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Assessing the shape of root canals: an in vitro method using microradiography.
    Thompson SA; al-Omari AO; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 1995 Mar; 28(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 7665202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A comparison of D-, E-, and F-speed conventional intraoral radiographic films in endodontic measurement.
    Sheaffer JC; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Mar; 93(3):337-40. PubMed ID: 11925545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [The evaluation of the ability of Apex D.S.P. to determine the length of root canal. In vitro study].
    Lewińska E; Lipski M; Marciniak-Paradowska M; Woźniak K; Lichota D
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 19374229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. In vitro comparison of three electronic apex locators.
    Guise GM; Goodell GG; Imamura GM
    J Endod; 2010 Feb; 36(2):279-81. PubMed ID: 20113790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Gray scale inversion in digital image for measurement of tooth length.
    Oliveira ML; Vieira ML; Cruz AD; Bóscolo FN; DE Almeida SM
    Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(6):703-6. PubMed ID: 23338264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Methodological considerations in the determination of working length.
    Martínez-Lozano MA; Forner-Navarro L; Sánchez-Cortés JL; Llena-Puy C
    Int Endod J; 2001 Jul; 34(5):371-6. PubMed ID: 11482720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of a digital radiography to estimate working length.
    Almenar García A; Forner Navarro L; Ubet Castelló V; Miñana Laliga R
    J Endod; 1997 Jun; 23(6):363-5. PubMed ID: 9580242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Establishing endodontic working length: a comparison of radiographic and electronic methods.
    Tidmarsh BG; Sherson W; Stalker NL
    N Z Dent J; 1985 Jul; 81(365):93-6. PubMed ID: 3865073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. In vitro radiographic determination of distances from working length files to root ends comparing Kodak RVG 6000, Schick CDR, and Kodak insight film.
    Radel RT; Goodell GG; McClanahan SB; Cohen ME
    J Endod; 2006 Jun; 32(6):566-8. PubMed ID: 16728253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Influence of clinical experience on the radiographic determination of endodontic working length.
    Alothmani OS; Friedlander LT; Monteith BD; Chandler NP
    Int Endod J; 2013 Mar; 46(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 22882229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of endodontic files in digital radiographs before and after employing three image processing algorithms.
    Li G; Sanderink GC; Welander U; McDavid WD; Näsström K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 15140815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. In vivo measurement accuracy in vital and necrotic canals with the Endex apex locator.
    Mayeda DL; Simon JH; Aimar DF; Finley K
    J Endod; 1993 Nov; 19(11):545-8. PubMed ID: 8151241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. An evaluation of two electronic apex locators in a dental student clinic.
    Himel VT; Cain C
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):803-6. PubMed ID: 20830894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
    Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.