These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7643053)

  • 1. Influence of case type, word frequency, and exposure duration on visual word recognition.
    Allen PA; Wallace B; Weber TA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Aug; 21(4):914-34. PubMed ID: 7643053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual word recognition: a multistage activation model.
    Borowsky R; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 Jul; 19(4):813-40. PubMed ID: 8345326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reading aloud: On the determinants of the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency.
    White D; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):749-756. PubMed ID: 27936847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A word or two about nonwords: Frequency, semantic neighborhood density, and orthography-to-semantics consistency effects for nonwords in the lexical decision task.
    Hendrix P; Sun CC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):157-183. PubMed ID: 31999159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of neighborhood size and exposure duration on visual-word recognition: evidence with the yes/no and the go/no-go lexical decision tasks.
    Perea M; Rosa E; Gómez C
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Feb; 65(2):273-86. PubMed ID: 12713243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The time-course of lexical activation in Japanese morphographic word recognition: evidence for a character-driven processing model.
    Miwa K; Libben G; Dijkstra T; Baayen H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):79-113. PubMed ID: 23713954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do handwritten words magnify lexical effects in visual word recognition?
    Perea M; Gil-López C; Beléndez V; Carreiras M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(8):1631-47. PubMed ID: 26340587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Letter position coding in attentional dyslexia.
    Shalev L; Mevorach C; Humphreys GW
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(8):2145-51. PubMed ID: 18420233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.
    Ellis AW; Brooks J; Lavidor M
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1128-37. PubMed ID: 15817170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. More words in the neighborhood: interference in lexical decision due to deletion neighbors.
    Davis CJ; Taff M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Oct; 12(5):904-10. PubMed ID: 16524009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does frequency trajectory influence word identification? A cross-task comparison.
    Lété B; Bonin P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(5):973-1000. PubMed ID: 23030693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual word learning in skilled readers of English.
    Kwok RK; Ellis AW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(2):326-49. PubMed ID: 25019273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do 'blacheap' and 'subcheap' both prime 'cheap'? An investigation of morphemic status and position in early visual word processing.
    Heathcote L; Nation K; Castles A; Beyersmann E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Aug; 71(8):1645-1654. PubMed ID: 28760071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The suffix priming effect: Further evidence for an early morpho-orthographic segmentation process independent of its semantic content.
    Lázaro M; Illera V; Sainz J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(1):197-208. PubMed ID: 25801451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lexical and sublexical processes in the perception of transposed-letter anagrams.
    Frankish C; Barnes L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):381-91. PubMed ID: 17935005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reading and lexicalization in opaque and transparent orthographies: Word naming and word learning in English and Spanish.
    Kwok RK; Cuetos F; Avdyli R; Ellis AW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):2105-2129. PubMed ID: 27609455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concurrent effects of lexical status and letter-rotation during early stage visual word recognition: evidence from ERPs.
    Kim AE; Straková J
    Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 1468():52-62. PubMed ID: 22784511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
    Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times.
    Adelman JS; Brown GD; Quesada JF
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):814-23. PubMed ID: 16984300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.