These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7643260)
1. Is there scientific support for the use of juice to facilitate the nonstress test? McCarthy KE; Narrigan D J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1995 May; 24(4):303-6. PubMed ID: 7643260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does Doppler-detected fetal movement decrease the incidence of nonreactive nonstress tests? Stanco LM; Rabello Y; Medearis AL; Paul RH Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Dec; 82(6):999-1003. PubMed ID: 8233279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nonstress test. Paul RH; Miller DA Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Mar; 38(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 7796551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Antepartum fetal surveillance. Nonstress test, contraction stress test, and biophysical profile. Babbitt NE S D J Med; 1996 Nov; 49(11):403-8. PubMed ID: 8973133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The startle test revisited. Miller JM; Rodriguez A; Gabert HA J Perinatol; 2004 Jul; 24(7):421-2. PubMed ID: 15152272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Fetal heart rate monitoring in ambulatory and resting mothers]. Ovadia D; Mazor M; Glezerman M Harefuah; 1991 Apr; 120(8):436-9. PubMed ID: 1885097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors that increase reactivity during fetal nonstress testing. Esin S Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 26(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 24614020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The uses and limitations of the fetal biophysical profile. Oyelese Y; Vintzileos AM Clin Perinatol; 2011 Mar; 38(1):47-64, v-vi. PubMed ID: 21353089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Auscultated fetal heart rate accelerations. An alternative to the nonstress test. Daniels SM; Boehm N J Nurse Midwifery; 1991; 36(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 2037878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the manual stimulation test and the nonstress test: a randomized controlled trial. Piyamongkol W; Trungtawatchai S; Chanprapaph P; Tongsong T J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Dec; 89(12):1999-2002. PubMed ID: 17214048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nonstress test: evidence-based use in high-risk pregnancy. Devoe LD; Jones CR Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 45(4):986-92. PubMed ID: 12438876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Nonstress and contraction stress fetal heart rate monitoring. A randomized trial to determine which is the faster primary test. Newnham JP; Burns SE; Szczygielski C; Roberman B J Reprod Med; 1988 Apr; 33(4):356-60. PubMed ID: 3367336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antenatal evaluation of the fetus using fetal movement monitoring. Velazquez MD; Rayburn WF Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 45(4):993-1004. PubMed ID: 12438877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Coupling of fetal movement and fetal heart rate accelerations as an indicator of fetal health. Baser I; Johnson TR; Paine LL Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jul; 80(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 1603499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A review of the nonstress test. Knuppel RA; Lake M; Ingram JM J Reprod Med; 1982 Mar; 27(3):120-6. PubMed ID: 7086760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]