These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7643804)

  • 1. Tests for evaluating laser film digitizers.
    Meeder RJ; Jaffray DA; Munro P
    Med Phys; 1995 May; 22(5):635-42. PubMed ID: 7643804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of imaging properties of a laser film digitizer.
    Yin FF; Giger ML; Doi K; Yoshimura H; Xu XW; Nishikawa RM
    Phys Med Biol; 1992 Jan; 37(1):273-80. PubMed ID: 1741429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A test pattern for quality control of laser scanner and charge-coupled device film digitizers.
    Halpern EJ
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 7734527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of the signal and noise characteristics of four CCD-based film digitizers.
    Hangiandreou NJ; O'Connor TJ; Felmlee JP
    Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):2020-6. PubMed ID: 9800711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The laser film digitizer: density, contrast, and resolution.
    Teslow TN
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Aug; 10(3 Suppl 1):128-32. PubMed ID: 9268857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer technique for digital radiographic images correction based on the digitizer characteristic curve.
    Escarpinati MC; Costa Vieira MA; Schiabel H
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():228-30. PubMed ID: 12105736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of a high quality film duplication system using a laser digitizer: comparison with computed radiography.
    Yoshimura H; Xu XW; Doi K; MacMahon H; Hoffmann KR; Giger ML; Montner SM
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 8455513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical experience with an advanced laser digitizer for cost-effective digital radiography.
    MacMahon H; Xu XW; Hoffmann KR; Giger ML; Yoshimura H; Doi K; Carlin M; Kano A; Yao L; Abe K
    Radiographics; 1993 May; 13(3):635-45; discussion 645-6. PubMed ID: 8316670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality assurance of picture archiving communication systems with laser film digitizers.
    Esser PD; Halpern EJ; Amis ES
    J Digit Imaging; 1991 Nov; 4(4):248-50. PubMed ID: 1772918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative optical densitometry with scanning-laser film digitizers.
    Dempsey JF; Low DA; Kirov AS; Williamson JF
    Med Phys; 1999 Aug; 26(8):1721-31. PubMed ID: 10501072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of three high-resolution digitizers for radiochromic film dosimetry.
    Gluckman GR; Reinstein LE
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1839-46. PubMed ID: 12201431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The VA-Cyberware lower limb prosthetics-orthotics optical laser digitizer.
    Houston VL; Mason CP; Beattie AC; LaBlanc KP; Garbarini M; Lorenze EJ; Thongpop CM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1995 Feb; 32(1):55-73. PubMed ID: 7760268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CCD film digitizers in clinical practice: evaluation of the main properties.
    Baruffaldi F; Angelini AL; Testi D; Mattioli P; Pierotti L
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2001; 26(2):101-14. PubMed ID: 11560291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Light photon equalization and its application to X-ray film digitization.
    Ishimitsu Y; Huang HK
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1995; 19(2):227-35. PubMed ID: 7780948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrast information of digital imaging in laser film digitizer and display monitor.
    Lo SC; Gaskill JW; Mun SK; Krasner BH
    J Digit Imaging; 1990 May; 3(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 2092810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A protocol-based evaluation of medical image digitizers.
    Efstathopoulos EP; Costaridou L; Kocsis O; Panayiotakis G
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Sep; 74(885):841-6. PubMed ID: 11560833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image calibration of laser digitizers, printers, and gray-scale displays.
    Siegel EL; Templeton AW; Cook LT; Eckard DA; Harrison LA; Dwyer SJ
    Radiographics; 1992 Mar; 12(2):329-35. PubMed ID: 1561421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Density related errors encountered with an electrostatically coupled film digitizer tablet.
    Jackson SA
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(1):59. PubMed ID: 1620059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interpretation accuracy of a CCD film digitizer.
    Gitlin JN; Scott WW; Bell K; Narayan A
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 12105698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.