BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7644200)

  • 41. Changes in otoacoustic emissions and high-frequency hearing thresholds in children and adolescents.
    Groh D; Pelanova J; Jilek M; Popelar J; Kabelka Z; Syka J
    Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 212(1-2):90-8. PubMed ID: 16364580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Test-retest reliability of wideband reflectance measures in infants under screening and diagnostic test conditions.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):669-81. PubMed ID: 17804981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Characteristics of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOES) in neonates.
    Aidan D; Lestang P; Avan P; Bonfils P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 Jan; 117(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 9039476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Low-frequency otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren measured by two commercial devices.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Piotrowska A; Kochanek K; Sliwa L; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Oct; 77(10):1724-8. PubMed ID: 23972827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Olivocochlear activity and temporary threshold shift-susceptibility in humans.
    Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Kuehn M; Tisch M; Vonthein R; Zenner HP
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov; 115(11):2021-8. PubMed ID: 16319617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [The study of evoked otoacoustic emissions in children].
    Caballero Mallea J; Marco Algarra J; Mallea Cañizares I; Morant Ventura A
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1994; 45(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 8204288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Is There a Safe Level for Recording Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential? Evidence From Cochlear and Hearing Function Tests.
    Singh NK; Keloth NK; Sinha S
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):493-500. PubMed ID: 30148803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Longitudinal measurements of distortion-product and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions of preterm infants: preliminary results.
    Smurzynski J
    Ear Hear; 1994 Jun; 15(3):210-23. PubMed ID: 8076719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Distortion product of otoacoustic emissions in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss].
    Schlögel H; Stephan K; Böheim K; Welzl-Müller K
    HNO; 1995 Jan; 43(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 7890546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Otoacoustic emissions and recruitment].
    Konopka W; Olszewski J
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2005; 59(5):731-6. PubMed ID: 16471192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions. The influence of the middle ear transmission.
    Osterhammel PA; Nielsen LH; Rasmussen AN
    Scand Audiol; 1993; 22(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 8321995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired adult ears.
    Smurzynski J; Leonard G; Kim DO; Lafreniere DC; Jung MD
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1990 Nov; 116(11):1309-16. PubMed ID: 2242262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Inter-Subject Variability in the Dependence of Medial-Olivocochlear Reflex Strength on Noise Bandwidth.
    Lee D; Lewis JD
    Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):544-557. PubMed ID: 36477401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Limitations in the use of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in objective audiometry as the result of fine structure.
    Heitmann J; Waldmann B; Plinkert PK
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1996; 253(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 8652159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [A study on the contralateral suppressive effects of distortion product otoacoustic emissions].
    Wang H; Zhong N
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Nov; 11(11):489-92. PubMed ID: 10323015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Role of the basal cochlea in the genesis of evoked acoustic oto-emissions in the subject with normal hearing].
    el-Bez M; Avan P; Erminy M; François M; Bonfils P
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1994; 111(8):443-9. PubMed ID: 7645896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Otoacoustic emissions in preterm infants: indications for cochlear development?
    Brienesse P; Anteunis L; Wit H; Gavilanes D; Maertzdorf W
    Audiology; 1996; 35(6):296-306. PubMed ID: 9018364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Test-retest variability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in human ears with normal hearing.
    Zhao F; Stephens D
    Scand Audiol; 1999; 28(3):171-8. PubMed ID: 10489866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Age-related changes in evoked otoacoustic emission in normal-hearing ears.
    O-Uchi T; Kanzaki J; Satoh Y; Yoshihara S; Ogata A; Inoue Y; Mashino H
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1994; 514():89-94. PubMed ID: 8073895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effect of otoacoustic emissions on just-noticeable differences for intensity in normally hearing subjects.
    Probst R; Harris FP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jul; 100(1):504-10. PubMed ID: 8675843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.