BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7644200)

  • 61. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in neonates: normative data.
    Bonfils P; Avan P; Francois M; Trotoux J; Narcy P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992 Sep; 112(5):739-44. PubMed ID: 1456027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Berlin CI; Hood LJ; Wen H; Szabo P; Cecola RP; Rigby P; Jackson DF
    Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 71(1-2):1-11. PubMed ID: 8113128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Preliminary results of otoacoustic emission measurement and standard values in young subjects with normal hearing. Part I: Measurement of spontaneous and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (SOAE, EOAE)].
    Kowalska S; Sułkowski W; Murowaniecki Z
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1994; 48(4):353-62. PubMed ID: 7970782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Immediate and short-term reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Beattie RC; Kenworthy OT; Luna CA
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Sep; 42(6):348-54. PubMed ID: 14570243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Characterizing a Joint Reflection-Distortion OAE Profile in Humans With Endolymphatic Hydrops.
    Stiepan S; Shera CA; Abdala C
    Ear Hear; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 44(6):1437-1450. PubMed ID: 37450653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Quantitative assessment of methods for the detection of otoacoustic emissions.
    Brass D; Kemp DT
    Ear Hear; 1994 Oct; 15(5):378-89. PubMed ID: 7813824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Suppression of tone burst evoked otoacoustic emissions in relation to frequency separation.
    Yoshikawa H; Smurzynski J; Probst R
    Hear Res; 2000 Oct; 148(1-2):95-106. PubMed ID: 10978828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. [Suppression of evoked otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise exposure in humans].
    Abe T; Tsuiki T; Ito S; Endo Y; Suzuki K; O-Uchi T
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1990 Nov; 93(11):1890-7. PubMed ID: 2280310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Stimulated otoacoustic emissions in children with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Tanaka Y; Kodera K; Suzuki M; Suzuki J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1989; 107(5-6):383-6. PubMed ID: 2756828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. A common microstructure in behavioral hearing thresholds and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.
    Dewey JB; Dhar S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov; 142(5):3069. PubMed ID: 29195446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing subjects.
    Norton SJ; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jun; 81(6):1860-72. PubMed ID: 3611507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Influence of acquisition parameters on the measurement of click evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates in a hospital environment.
    Welch D; Greville KA; Thorne PR; Purdy SC
    Audiology; 1996; 35(3):143-57. PubMed ID: 8864256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Otoacoustic emissions and quinine sulfate.
    McFadden D; Pasanen EG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jun; 95(6):3460-74. PubMed ID: 8046138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Comparison of standard and abbreviated distortion product otoacoustic emissions procedures.
    Musiek FE; Baran JA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1996 Oct; 7(5):370-4. PubMed ID: 8898274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Auditory threshold evaluation by distortion-product oto-acoustic emissions using decision support system.
    Bonfils P; Avan P; Elbez M; Deys S; Erminy M; François M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Jul; 114(4):360-5. PubMed ID: 7976306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. TE and DP otoacoustic emission data from an Australian cross-sectional hearing study.
    Carter L; Williams W; Seeto M
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(11):806-17. PubMed ID: 26156303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Time-frequency distributions of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Tognola G; Grandori F; Ravazzani P
    Hear Res; 1997 Apr; 106(1-2):112-22. PubMed ID: 9112111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Reporting click-evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emission results with respect to the pure-tone audiogram.
    Harris FP; Probst R
    Ear Hear; 1991 Dec; 12(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 1797607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The influence of disappearing and reappearing spontaneous otoacoustic emissions on one subject's threshold microstructure.
    Smurzynski J; Probst R
    Hear Res; 1998 Jan; 115(1-2):197-205. PubMed ID: 9472748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Reflection-Source Emissions Evoked with Clicks and Frequency Sweeps: Comparisons Across Levels.
    Charaziak KK; Shera CA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 22(6):641-658. PubMed ID: 34606020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.