69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7644648)
1. Development of a community mammography registry: experience in the breast screening program project.
Clark R; Geller B; Peluso N; McVety D; Worden JK
Radiology; 1995 Sep; 196(3):811-5. PubMed ID: 7644648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interval breast cancers in the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: analysis and classification.
Burhenne HJ; Burhenne LW; Goldberg F; Hislop TG; Worth AJ; Rebbeck PM; Kan L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 May; 162(5):1067-71; discussion 1072-5. PubMed ID: 8165983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The New Hampshire Mammography Network: the development and design of a population-based registry.
Carney PA; Poplack SP; Wells WA; Littenberg B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Aug; 167(2):367-72. PubMed ID: 8686606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality assurance audits of community screening mammography practices: availability of active follow-up for data collection and outcome assessment.
Brown ML; Houn F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):825-9. PubMed ID: 8092017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography in an academic practice.
Gur D; Wallace LP; Klym AH; Hardesty LA; Abrams GS; Shah R; Sumkin JH
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):396-401. PubMed ID: 15770039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of recommendations for breast biopsies in women receiving mammograms from a county health van.
Kann PE; Bradley C; Lane DS
Public Health Rep; 1998; 113(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 9475937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association of recall rates with sensitivity and positive predictive values of screening mammography.
Yankaskas BC; Cleveland RJ; Schell MJ; Kozar R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):543-9. PubMed ID: 11517044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of service screening for breast cancer by clinical breast examination using regional cancer registry data].
Sibata A; Takahashi T; Ouchi N; Fukao A
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2005 Feb; 52(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 15791899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast Cancer Screening Project in Northeast Florida.
Paryani SB; Marsland TA; Faucher P; Fontanelli E; Freeman M; Johnston H; Morrow W; Prabhu P; Stearman M; Vines F
J Fla Med Assoc; 1990 Jan; 77(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 2299324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammography registry: considerations and options.
Clark RA; King PS; Worden JK
Radiology; 1989 Apr; 171(1):91-3. PubMed ID: 2928551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Community-based mammography practice: services, charges, and interpretation methods.
Hendrick RE; Cutter GR; Berns EA; Nakano C; Egger J; Carney PA; Abraham L; Taplin SH; D'Orsi CJ; Barlow W; Elmore JG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):433-8. PubMed ID: 15671359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample.
Beam CA; Layde PM; Sullivan DC
Arch Intern Med; 1996 Jan; 156(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 8546556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of self-reported breast and cervical cancer screening tests among low-income minority women.
Paskett ED; Tatum CM; Mack DW; Hoen H; Case LD; Velez R
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Sep; 5(9):721-6. PubMed ID: 8877064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast and cervical cancer screening: clinicians' views on health plan guidelines and implementation efforts.
Zapka JG; Puleo E; Taplin S; Solberg LI; Mouchawar J; Somkin C; Geiger AM; Ulcickas Yood M
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):46-54. PubMed ID: 16287885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and implementation of a quality assurance program for mammography.
de Paredes ES; Frazier AB; Hartwell GD; Strash AM; Scheer C; Smith DC; Barnette PA; Noel W; Kenneweg D
Radiology; 1987 Apr; 163(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 3823463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Beyond mammography screening: quality assurance in breast cancer diagnosis (The QuaMaDi Project).
Katalinic A; Bartel C; Raspe H; Schreer I
Br J Cancer; 2007 Jan; 96(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 17179994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The New Mexico Mammography Project. Screening mammography performance in Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1991 to 1993.
Rosenberg RD; Lando JF; Hunt WC; Darling RR; Williamson MR; Linver MN; Gilliland FD; Key CR
Cancer; 1996 Oct; 78(8):1731-9. PubMed ID: 8859186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditing and benchmarks in screening and diagnostic mammography.
Feig SA
Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):791-800, vi. PubMed ID: 17888769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [When are recommended breast biopsies carried out, and what information does the physician responsible for mammography receive? Experiences with 317 breast biopsy in a regional quality assurance project for screening mammography].
Meyer JM; Swart E; Dierks ML; Robra BP
Pathologe; 1997 Jan; 18(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 9157406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
