These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

456 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7645461)

  • 1. Detection of ureteral calculi in patients with suspected renal colic: value of reformatted noncontrast helical CT.
    Sommer FG; Jeffrey RB; Rubin GD; Napel S; Rimmer SA; Benford J; Harter PM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):509-13. PubMed ID: 7645461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiologic investigation of renal colic: unenhanced helical CT compared with excretory urography.
    Sourtzis S; Thibeau JF; Damry N; Raslan A; Vandendris M; Bellemans M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jun; 172(6):1491-4. PubMed ID: 10350278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can noncontrast helical computed tomography replace intravenous urography for evaluation of patients with acute urinary tract colic?
    Chen MY; Zagoria RJ
    J Emerg Med; 1999; 17(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 10195491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones: incidence of associated urinary tract findings.
    Katz DS; Lane MJ; Sommer FG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jun; 166(6):1319-22. PubMed ID: 8633440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trends in the use of unenhanced helical CT for acute urinary colic.
    Chen MY; Zagoria RJ; Saunders HS; Dyer RB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1447-50. PubMed ID: 10584780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic.
    Poletti PA; Platon A; Rutschmann OT; Schmidlin FR; Iselin CE; Becker CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Apr; 188(4):927-33. PubMed ID: 17377025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Low-dose unenhanced multidetector CT of patients with suspected renal colic.
    Tack D; Sourtzis S; Delpierre I; de Maertelaer V; Gevenois PA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Feb; 180(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 12540420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Spiral computerized tomography without perfusion of contrast media as first line investigation in patients with renal colic].
    Romano S; Rollandi GA; Scaglione M; Biscaldi E; Cantoni S; Rebaudi F; Del Vecchio A; Grassi R
    Radiol Med; 2000 Oct; 100(4):251-6. PubMed ID: 11155452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical characteristics of ureteral calculi detected by nonenhanced computerized tomography after unclear results of plain radiography and ultrasonography.
    Kobayashi T; Nishizawa K; Watanabe J; Ogura K
    J Urol; 2003 Sep; 170(3):799-802. PubMed ID: 12913701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How accurate are emergency clinicians at interpreting noncontrast computed tomography for suspected renal colic?
    Holdgate A; Chan T
    Acad Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 10(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 12670843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MAG3-F0 scintigraphy in decision making for emergency intervention in renal colic after helical CT positive for a urolith.
    Sfakianakis GN; Cohen DJ; Braunstein RH; Leveillee RJ; Lerner I; Bird VG; Sfakianakis E; Georgiou MF; Block NL; Lynne CM
    J Nucl Med; 2000 Nov; 41(11):1813-22. PubMed ID: 11079488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low-dose nonenhanced helical CT of renal colic: assessment of ureteric stone detection and measurement of effective dose equivalent.
    Liu W; Esler SJ; Kenny BJ; Goh RH; Rainbow AJ; Stevenson GW
    Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 10751467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ureteral calculi: diagnostic efficacy of helical CT and implications for treatment of patients.
    Boulay I; Holtz P; Foley WD; White B; Begun FP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jun; 172(6):1485-90. PubMed ID: 10350277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unenhanced helical CT using increased pitch for suspected renal colic: an effective technique for radiation dose reduction?
    Diel J; Perlmutter S; Venkataramanan N; Mueller R; Lane MJ; Katz DS
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000; 24(5):795-801. PubMed ID: 11045705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can computed tomography scout radiography replace plain film in the evaluation of patients with acute urinary tract colic?
    Ege G; Akman H; Kuzucu K; Yildiz S
    Acta Radiol; 2004 Jul; 45(4):469-73. PubMed ID: 15323403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonenhanced helical CT and US in the emergency evaluation of patients with renal colic: prospective comparison.
    Sheafor DH; Hertzberg BS; Freed KS; Carroll BA; Keogan MT; Paulson EK; DeLong DM; Nelson RC
    Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):792-7. PubMed ID: 11110945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of unenhanced helical CT to evaluate suspected renal colic.
    Lanoue MZ; Mindell HJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Dec; 169(6):1579-84. PubMed ID: 9393169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation of ureteral stone measurements by CT and plain film radiography: utility of the KUB.
    Katz D; McGahan JP; Gerscovich EO; Troxel SA; Low RK
    J Endourol; 2003 Dec; 17(10):847-50. PubMed ID: 14744346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity of CT scout radiography and abdominal radiography for revealing ureteral calculi on helical CT: implications for radiologic follow-up.
    Assi Z; Platt JF; Francis IR; Cohan RH; Korobkin M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Aug; 175(2):333-7. PubMed ID: 10915669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Suspected ureteral colic: primary helical CT versus selective helical CT after unenhanced radiography and sonography.
    Catalano O; Nunziata A; Altei F; Siani A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):379-87. PubMed ID: 11804898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.