62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7645495)
1. Imaging systems evaluation: effect of subtle cases on the design and analysis of receiver operating characteristic studies.
Rockette HE; King JL; Medina JL; Eisen HB; Brown ML; Gur D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):679-83. PubMed ID: 7645495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sample size tables for receiver operating characteristic studies.
Obuchowski NA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Sep; 175(3):603-8. PubMed ID: 10954438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prevalence effect in a laboratory environment.
Gur D; Rockette HE; Armfield DR; Blachar A; Bogan JK; Brancatelli G; Britton CA; Brown ML; Davis PL; Ferris JV; Fuhrman CR; Golla SK; Katyal S; Lacomis JM; McCook BM; Thaete FL; Warfel TE
Radiology; 2003 Jul; 228(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 12832568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chest radiography with a shaped filter at 140 kVp: its diagnostic accuracy compared with that of standard radiographs.
Guilbeau JC; Mazoyer BM; Pruvost P; Verrey B; Grenier P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 May; 150(5):1007-10. PubMed ID: 3258700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A permutation test sensitive to differences in areas for comparing ROC curves from a paired design.
Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2873-93. PubMed ID: 16134144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A constrained formulation for the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve based on probability summation.
Swensson RG; King JL; Gur D
Med Phys; 2001 Aug; 28(8):1597-609. PubMed ID: 11548929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Computer-aided diagnosis in the detection of temporal changes in sequential chest radiographs].
Sanada S
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Dec; 58(14):824-30. PubMed ID: 10028835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reader variance in ROC studies--generalizability to reader population at high and low performance levels.
Gur D; Bandos AI; Klym AH; Rockette HE
Acad Radiol; 2006 Aug; 13(8):1004-10. PubMed ID: 16843853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Observer performance studies: detection of single versus multiple abnormalities of the chest.
Fuhrman CR; Britton CA; Bender T; Sumkin JH; Brown ML; Holbert JM; Chang TS; Rockette HE; Gur D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1551-3. PubMed ID: 12438053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selection of subtle cases for observer-performance studies: the importance of knowing the true diagnosis.
Rockette HE; King JL; Thaete FL; Fuhrman CR; Slifko RM; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 1998 Feb; 5(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 9484540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment.
Chakraborty DP; Winter LH
Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):873-81. PubMed ID: 2305073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measuring performance in chest radiography.
Potchen EJ; Cooper TG; Sierra AE; Aben GR; Potchen MJ; Potter MG; Siebert JE
Radiology; 2000 Nov; 217(2):456-9. PubMed ID: 11058645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The prevalence effect in a laboratory environment: Changing the confidence ratings.
Gur D; Bandos AI; Fuhrman CR; Klym AH; King JL; Rockette HE
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jan; 14(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 17178365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Observer variation and the performance accuracy gained by averaging ratings of abnormality.
Swensson RG; King JL; Good WF; Gur D
Med Phys; 2000 Aug; 27(8):1920-33. PubMed ID: 10984238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using localization data from image interpretations to improve estimates of performance accuracy.
Swensson RG
Med Decis Making; 2000; 20(2):170-85. PubMed ID: 10772355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative assessment of digitized portal images: effect of sampling frequency on observer performance.
Okajima K; Nagata Y; Mitsumori M; Ishigaki T; Kimura I; Nakano Y; Minato K; Komori M; Sato K; Takahashi T
Radiology; 1992 May; 183(2):569-72. PubMed ID: 1561370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Hanley JA; McNeil BJ
Radiology; 1982 Apr; 143(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 7063747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Empiric assessment of parameters that affect the design of multireader receiver operating characteristic studies.
Rockette HE; Campbell WL; Britton CA; Holbert JM; King JL; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 1999 Dec; 6(12):723-9. PubMed ID: 10887893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical power considerations for a utility endpoint in observer performance studies.
Abbey CK; Samuelson FW; Gallas BD
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jul; 20(7):798-806. PubMed ID: 23611439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lung lesions: correlation between viewing time and detection.
Oestmann JW; Greene R; Kushner DC; Bourgouin PM; Linetsky L; Llewellyn HJ
Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):451-3. PubMed ID: 3336720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
