388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7645609)
1. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy.
Moore BC; Higgins RV; Laurent SL; Marroum MC; Bellitt P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive factors used to justify hysterectomy after loop conization: increasing age and severity of disease.
Kalogirou D; Antoniou G; Karakitsos P; Botsis D; Kalogirou O; Giannikos L
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1997; 18(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 9105859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictive factors for residual disease in hysterectomy specimens after conization in early-stage cervical cancer.
Wong AS; Li WH; Cheung TH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr; 199():21-6. PubMed ID: 26894378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prevalence and risk factors for residual cervical neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy following LEEP or conization.
Natee J; Therasakvichaya S; Boriboonhirunsarn D
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88(10):1344-8. PubMed ID: 16519377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting persistent/recurrent disease in the cervix after excisional biopsy.
Ramchandani SM; Houck KL; Hernandez E; Gaughan JP
MedGenMed; 2007 Apr; 9(2):24. PubMed ID: 17955080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Value of human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid testing after conization in the prediction of residual disease in the subsequent hysterectomy specimen.
Lin CT; Tseng CJ; Lai CH; Hsueh S; Huang KG; Huang HJ; Chao A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr; 184(5):940-5. PubMed ID: 11303202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictive factors for residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for CIN III.
Lu CH; Liu FS; Tseng JJ; Ho ES
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Nov; 79(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 11063658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
Lu CH; Liu FS; Kuo CJ; Chang CC; Ho ES
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 16582119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens.
An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P
Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases].
Liu L; Chen LM; Tao X; Dai F; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):751-756. PubMed ID: 29179270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk factors predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III and microinvasive cervical cancer.
Park JY; Lee SM; Yoo CW; Kang S; Park SY; Seo SS
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17582476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The value of endocervical curettage after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Schneider P; von Orelli S; Roos M; Leo C; Fink D; Wyss P
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2012 Aug; 16(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 22115536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Value of endocervical margin and high-risk human papillomavirus status after conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ, and microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Kong TW; Son JH; Chang SJ; Paek J; Lee Y; Ryu HS
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Dec; 135(3):468-73. PubMed ID: 25284039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extensive lesions and a positive cone margin are strong predictors of residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for squamous intraepithelial lesion grade 2 or 3 study design.
Peng H; Liu W; Jiang J; Du H
BMC Womens Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):454. PubMed ID: 37641051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II-III with endocervical cone margin involvement after cervical loop conization: is there any predictor for residual disease?
Kietpeerakool C; Khunamornpong S; Srisomboon J; Siriaunkgul S; Suprasert P
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Oct; 33(5):660-4. PubMed ID: 17845326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dysplastic endocervical curettings: a predictor of cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Temkin SM; Hellmann M; Lee YC; Abulafia O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):469.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17466706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictors and clinical significance of the positive cone margin in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III patients.
Sun XG; Ma SQ; Zhang JX; Wu M
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 19302737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study.
Alder S; Megyessi D; Sundström K; Östensson E; Mints M; Belkić K; Arbyn M; Andersson S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):172.e1-172.e12. PubMed ID: 31473226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of disease persistence after conization for microinvasive cervical carcinoma and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Lin H; Chang HY; Huang CC; Changchien CC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2004; 14(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 15086731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
