These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7645700)
1. The TOF-Guard neuromuscular transmission monitor. A comparison with the Myograph 2000. Loan PB; Paxton LD; Mirakhur RK; Connolly FM; McCoy EP Anaesthesia; 1995 Aug; 50(8):699-702. PubMed ID: 7645700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New equipment for neuromuscular transmission monitoring: a comparison of the TOF-Guard with the Myograph 2000. Kirkegaard-Nielsen H; Helbo-Hansen HS; Lindholm P; Pedersen HS; Severinsen IK; Schmidt MB J Clin Monit Comput; 1998 Jan; 14(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9641852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement of acceleration: a new method of monitoring neuromuscular function. Viby-Mogensen J; Jensen E; Werner M; Nielsen HK Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1988 Jan; 32(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 2830760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Double burst monitoring during recovery from atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade: a comparison with train-of-four. Kirkegaard-Nielsen H; Helbo-Hansen HS; Severinsen IK; Lindholm P; Bülow K Int J Clin Monit Comput; 1996 Nov; 13(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 9080241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [A new neuromuscular transmission monitor (TOF Guard): the rationale behind the method and its clinical usefulness]. Ueda N; Masuda Y; Muteki T; Tsuda H; Hiraki T; Harada H; Tobata H Masui; 1994 Jan; 43(1):134-9. PubMed ID: 8309049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monitoring recovery from rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block using acceleromyography at the trapezius versus the adductor pollicis muscle: an observational trial. Soltesz S; Stark C; Noé KG; Anapolski M; Mencke T Can J Anaesth; 2016 Jun; 63(6):709-17. PubMed ID: 26864194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of a new neuromuscular transmission monitor compressomyograph with mechanomyograph. Dahaba AA; Bornemann H; Holst B; Wilfinger G; Metzler H Br J Anaesth; 2008 Mar; 100(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 18238840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bias, limits of agreement, and percent errors between acceleromyography and mechanomyography in anesthetized dogs. Sakai DM; Romano M; Tseng CT; Flanders A; Martin-Flores M Vet J; 2018 Mar; 233():3-7. PubMed ID: 29486876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Value of monitoring muscle relaxation]. Jöhr M; Gerber H Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1996 Sep; 126(39):1649-53. PubMed ID: 8927968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monitoring of neuromuscular transmission by electromyography during anaesthesia. A comparison with mechanomyography in cat and man. Engbaek J Dan Med Bull; 1996 Sep; 43(4):301-16. PubMed ID: 8884132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monitoring neuromuscular block by acceleromyography: comparison of the Mini-Accelograph with the Myograph 2000. Harper NJ; Martlew R; Strang T; Wallace M Br J Anaesth; 1994 Apr; 72(4):411-4. PubMed ID: 8155441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acceleromyography vs. electromyography: an ipsilateral comparison of the indirectly evoked neuromuscular response to train-of-four stimulation. Kopman AF; Chin W; Cyriac J Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Mar; 49(3):316-22. PubMed ID: 15752395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The neuromuscular transmission monitor. A clinical assessment and comparison with a force transducer. Windsor JP; Sebel PS; Flynn PJ Anaesthesia; 1985 Feb; 40(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 2983581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship of post-tetanic count and train-of-four response during intense neuromuscular blockade caused by atracurium. Bonsu AK; Viby-Mogensen J; Fernando PU; Muchhal K; Tamilarasan A; Lambourne A Br J Anaesth; 1987 Sep; 59(9):1089-92. PubMed ID: 2822066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of double-burst and train-of-four stimulation to assess neuromuscular blockade in children. Saddler JM; Bevan JC; Donati F; Bevan DR; Pinto SR Anesthesiology; 1990 Sep; 73(3):401-3. PubMed ID: 2168135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. TOF-Watch(R) monitor: failure to calculate the train-of-four ratio in the absence of baseline calibration in anaesthetized dogs. Martin-Flores M; Gleed RD; Basher KL; Scarlett JM; Campoy L; Kopman AF Br J Anaesth; 2012 Feb; 108(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 22106378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Normalization of acceleromyographic train-of-four ratio by baseline value for detecting residual neuromuscular block. Suzuki T; Fukano N; Kitajima O; Saeki S; Ogawa S Br J Anaesth; 2006 Jan; 96(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 16299046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Manual evaluation of residual curarization using double burst stimulation: a comparison with train-of-four. Drenck NE; Ueda N; Olsen NV; Engbaek J; Jensen E; Skovgaard LT; Viby-Mogensen J Anesthesiology; 1989 Apr; 70(4):578-81. PubMed ID: 2929994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The accuracy of train-of-four monitoring at varying stimulating currents. Helbo-Hansen HS; Bang U; Nielsen HK; Skovgaard LT Anesthesiology; 1992 Feb; 76(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 1736696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acceleromyography improves detection of residual neuromuscular blockade in children. Ansermino JM; Sanderson PM; Bevan JC; Bevan DR Can J Anaesth; 1996 Jun; 43(6):589-94. PubMed ID: 8773866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]