250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7645888)
1. [Auditory evoked potentials by electric stimulation of the cochlea].
Sarfati D; Bestry C; Moatti L; Garabedian EN
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1994; 111(7):389-92. PubMed ID: 7645888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of electrophysiologic measures in the management of children with cochlear implants: brainstem, middle latency, and cognitive (P300) responses.
Kileny PR
Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():37-42; discussion 43-7. PubMed ID: 2069187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
Thai-Van H; Cozma S; Boutitie F; Disant F; Truy E; Collet L
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new stimulation strategy for recording electrical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant patients.
Hervé T; Truy E; Durupt I; Collet L
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Sep; 100(5):472-8. PubMed ID: 8893666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraoperative test of auditory nerve function.
Frohne C; Lesinski A; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S93-4. PubMed ID: 9391614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incidence and characteristics of facial nerve stimulation in children with cochlear implants.
Cushing SL; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1787-91. PubMed ID: 17003731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? Part 2: On electrically evoked late auditory responses.
Guiraud J; Gallego S; Arnold L; Boyle P; Truy E; Collet L
Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):44-57. PubMed ID: 17350776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An objective evaluation of retrocochlear function by means of CNT (Cochlear Nerve Tester).
Latkowski B; Gryczynski M; Jozwiak J; Krupa D; Makowski A; Komorowska A; Sidor W
Panminerva Med; 1993 Dec; 35(4):197-200. PubMed ID: 8202331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Auditory development in the absence of hearing in infancy.
Gordon KA; Valero J; Jewell SF; Ahn J; Papsin BC
Neuroreport; 2010 Feb; 21(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 20042902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy.
Papsin BC
Laryngoscope; 2005 Jan; 115(1 Pt 2 Suppl 106):1-26. PubMed ID: 15626926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An evoked potential study of the developmental time course of the auditory nerve and brainstem in children using cochlear implants.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11(1):7-23. PubMed ID: 16219994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrically evoked auditory potentials: current clinical applications in children with cochlear implants.
Kileny PR; Zwolan TA; Boerst A; Telian SA
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S90-2. PubMed ID: 9391613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Auditory brainstem activity in children with 9-30 months of bilateral cochlear implant use.
Gordon KA; Valero J; Papsin BC
Hear Res; 2007 Nov; 233(1-2):97-107. PubMed ID: 17850999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response.
Firszt JB; Chambers RD; Kraus And N; Reeder RM
Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? (1): On electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses.
Guiraud J; Gallego S; Arnold L; Boyle P; Truy E; Collet L
Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):48-60. PubMed ID: 17157463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Results of the round window electrical stimulation in 460 cases of total deafness.
Meyer B; Drira M; Gegu D; Chouard CH
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():168-76. PubMed ID: 6596841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [An experimental study on the auditory brainstem response to electrical stimulation of the cochlea].
Saito H
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1990 Jan; 93(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 2319389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of cochlear implant use on the electrically evoked middle latency response in children.
Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 204(1-2):78-89. PubMed ID: 15925193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
