174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7646205)
1. Bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the elderly: benefits and risks.
Holper K; Wottke M; Lewe T; Baumer L; Meisner H; Paek SU; Sebening F
Ann Thorac Surg; 1995 Aug; 60(2 Suppl):S443-6. PubMed ID: 7646205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bioprosthetic versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in the elderly.
Davis EA; Greene PS; Cameron DE; Gott VI; Laschinger JC; Stuart RS; Sussman MS; Watkins L; Baumgartner WA
Circulation; 1996 Nov; 94(9 Suppl):II121-5. PubMed ID: 8901731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of outcomes in men 11 years after heart-valve replacement with a mechanical valve or bioprosthesis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease.
Hammermeister KE; Sethi GK; Henderson WG; Oprian C; Kim T; Rahimtoola S
N Engl J Med; 1993 May; 328(18):1289-96. PubMed ID: 8469251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preferability of bioprostheses for isolated aortic valve replacement--a comparative study between mechanical and bioprosthetic valves.
Kawachi Y; Tokunaga K
Jpn Circ J; 1990 Feb; 54(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 2355449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 10-year experience with the Biocor porcine bioprosthesis in the aortic position.
Mykén PS; Caidahl K; Larsson S; Berggren HE
J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Nov; 3(6):648-56. PubMed ID: 8000608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aortic valve selection in the elderly patient.
Borkon AM; Soule LM; Baughman KL; Baumgartner WA; Gardner TJ; Watkins L; Gott VL; Hall KA; Reitz BA
Ann Thorac Surg; 1988 Sep; 46(3):270-7. PubMed ID: 3415376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relation between choice of prostheses and late outcome in double-valve replacement.
Brown PS; Roberts CS; McIntosh CL; Swain JA; Clark RE
Ann Thorac Surg; 1993 Mar; 55(3):631-40. PubMed ID: 8452425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic or mitral position: a 12-year experience.
Neville PH; Aupart MR; Diemont FF; Sirinelli AL; Lemoine EM; Marchand MA
Ann Thorac Surg; 1998 Dec; 66(6 Suppl):S143-7. PubMed ID: 9930436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experience with low-dose aspirin as thromboprophylaxis for the Tissuemed porcine aortic bioprosthesis: a survey of five years' experience.
Goldsmith I; Lip GY; Mukundan S; Rosin MD
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 9793859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses.
Fann JI; Miller DC; Moore KA; Mitchell RS; Oyer PE; Stinson EB; Robbins RC; Reitz BA; Shumway NE
Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance to seventeen years.
Jamieson WR; Munro AI; Miyagishima RT; Allen P; Burr LH; Tyers GF
Ann Thorac Surg; 1995 Oct; 60(4):999-1006; discussion 1007. PubMed ID: 7575007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cardiac valve replacement in the elderly: clinical performance of biological prostheses.
Jamieson WR; Burr LH; Munro AI; Miyagishima RT; Gerein AN
Ann Thorac Surg; 1989 Aug; 48(2):173-84; discussion 185. PubMed ID: 2764609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Valve-related complications in elderly patients with biological and mechanical aortic valves.
Milano A; Guglielmi C; De Carlo M; Di Gregorio O; Borzoni G; Verunelli F; Bortolotti U
Ann Thorac Surg; 1998 Dec; 66(6 Suppl):S82-7. PubMed ID: 9930423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term evaluation of bioprosthetic valves: 615 consecutive cases.
Bloch G; Vouhe PR; Menu P; Poulain H; Cachera JP; Aubry P; Heurtematte Y; Loisance DY; Vernant P; Galey JJ
Eur Heart J; 1984 Oct; 5 Suppl D():73-80. PubMed ID: 6519105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Medtronic Intact xenograft: an analysis of 342 patients over a seven-year follow-up period.
O'Brien MF; Stafford EG; Gardner MA; Pohlner PG; Tesar PJ; Kear L; Smith SE
Ann Thorac Surg; 1995 Aug; 60(2 Suppl):S253-7. PubMed ID: 7646168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Choice of replacement valve in the elderly.
Kobayashi Y; Eishi K; Nagata S; Nakano K; Sasako Y; Kobayashi J; Kosakai Y; Miyatake K
J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Jul; 6(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 9263873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Thromboembolic and haemorrhagic risk in mechanical and biological aortic prostheses.
Farah E; Enriquez-Sarano M; Vahanian A; Houlegatte JP; Boubaker A; Roger V; Acar J
Eur Heart J; 1984 Oct; 5 Suppl D():43-7. PubMed ID: 6519101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis.
Wang Y; Chen S; Shi J; Li G; Dong N
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26675564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
