BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7647187)

  • 21. Isolating the neural mechanisms of interference during continuous multisensory dual-task performance.
    Kasper RW; Cecotti H; Touryan J; Eckstein MP; Giesbrecht B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):476-89. PubMed ID: 24047391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sensory and movement-related cortical potentials in nociceptive and auditory reaction time tasks.
    Tarkka IM; Treede RD; Bromm B
    Acta Neurol Scand; 1992 Oct; 86(4):359-64. PubMed ID: 1455981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A modified oddball paradigm "cross-modal delayed response" and the research on mismatch negativity.
    Wei JH; Chan TC; Luo YJ
    Brain Res Bull; 2002 Jan; 57(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 11849829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Event-related potentials in depression: influence of task, stimulus hemifield and clinical features on P3 latency.
    Bruder GE; Towey JP; Stewart JW; Friedman D; Tenke C; Quitkin FM
    Biol Psychiatry; 1991 Aug; 30(3):233-46. PubMed ID: 1912115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Selective attention in auditory processing as reflected by event-related brain potentials.
    Alho K
    Psychophysiology; 1992 May; 29(3):247-63. PubMed ID: 1626035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Time effects on event-related brain potentials and vigilance performance.
    Koelega HS; Verbaten MN; van Leeuwen TH; Kenemans JL; Kemner C; Sjouw W
    Biol Psychol; 1992 Oct; 34(1):59-86. PubMed ID: 1420655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Self-initiated actions result in suppressed auditory but amplified visual evoked components in healthy participants.
    Mifsud NG; Oestreich LK; Jack BN; Ford JM; Roach BJ; Mathalon DH; Whitford TJ
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 26751981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. P300 response under active and passive attentional states and uni- and bimodality stimulus presentation conditions.
    Rappaport M; Clifford JO; Winterfield KM
    J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci; 1990; 2(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 2136392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of auditory distraction on electrophysiological brain activity and performance in children aged 8-13 years.
    Gumenyuk V; Korzyukov O; Alho K; Escera C; Näätänen R
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Jan; 41(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 14692998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Auditory and visual cortical activity during selective attention in fragile X syndrome: a cascade of processing deficiencies.
    Van der Molen MJ; Van der Molen MW; Ridderinkhof KR; Hamel BC; Curfs LM; Ramakers GJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 123(4):720-9. PubMed ID: 21958658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Involuntary listening aids seeing: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    McDonald JJ; Ward LM
    Psychol Sci; 2000 Mar; 11(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 11273425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Nicotine receptor gene CHRNA4 modulates early event-related potentials in auditory and visual oddball target detection tasks.
    Espeseth T; Endestad T; Rootwelt H; Reinvang I
    Neuroscience; 2007 Jul; 147(4):974-85. PubMed ID: 17590520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The temporal selectivity of additive factor effects on the reaction process revealed in ERP component latencies.
    Smulders FT; Kok A; Kenemans JL; Bashore TR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1995 Nov; 90(1-3):97-109. PubMed ID: 8525879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Consciousness of attention and expectancy as reflected in event-related potentials and reaction times.
    Sommer W; Matt J; Leuthold H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Sep; 16(5):902-15. PubMed ID: 2147445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Employing an active mental task to enhance the performance of auditory attention-based brain-computer interfaces.
    Xu H; Zhang D; Ouyang M; Hong B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Jan; 124(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 22854211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?
    Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16814442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cross-modal selective attention to visual and auditory stimuli modulates endogenous ERP components.
    Luo YJ; Wei JH
    Brain Res; 1999 Sep; 842(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 10526092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Concepts and applications of EEG analysis in aviation performance evaluation.
    Sterman MB; Mann CA
    Biol Psychol; 1995 May; 40(1-2):115-30. PubMed ID: 7647174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attending to visual or auditory motion affects perception within and across modalities: an event-related potential study.
    Beer AL; Röder B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 21(4):1116-30. PubMed ID: 15787717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.