These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7648678)

  • 1. Effect of rapid pacing and T-wave scanning on the relation between the defibrillation and upper-limit-of-vulnerability dose-response curves.
    Malkin RA; Idriss SF; Walker RG; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1995 Sep; 92(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 7648678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation probability of success curves using a nonthoracotomy lead system.
    Souza JJ; Malkin RA; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1995 Feb; 91(4):1247-52. PubMed ID: 7850965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation of acute and chronic defibrillation threshold with upper limit of vulnerability determined in normal sinus rhythm.
    Birgersdotter-Green U; Undesser K; Fujimura O; Feld GK; Kass RM; Mandel WJ; Peter CT; Chen PS
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 3(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 10387143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hemodynamic collapse, geometry, and the rapidly paced upper limit of ventricular vulnerability to fibrillation by T-wave stimulation.
    Malkin RA; Hoffmeister BK
    J Electrocardiol; 2000 Jul; 33(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 10954381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Timing of the upper limit of vulnerability is different for monophasic and biphasic shocks: implications for the determination of the defibrillation threshold.
    Behrens S; Li C; Franz MR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2179-87. PubMed ID: 9309741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental cardiac tachyarrhythmias in guinea pigs.
    Malkin RA
    J Electrocardiol; 1999; 32 Suppl():84-6. PubMed ID: 10688307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The zone of vulnerability to T wave shocks in humans.
    Swerdlow CD; Martin DJ; Kass RM; Davie S; Mandel WJ; Gang ES; Chen PS
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 8(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 9147699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Relationship Between Cardiac Vulnerability and Restitution Properties of the Ventricular Activation Recovery Interval.
    Yamashita S; Yoshida A; Fukuzawa K; Nakanishi T; Matsumoto A; Konishi H; Ichibori H; Hyogo K; Imada H; Hirata K
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Jul; 26(7):768-73. PubMed ID: 25810143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological effects of monophasic and biphasic stimuli in normal and infarcted dogs.
    Wharton JM; Richard VJ; Murry CE; Dixon EG; Reimer KA; Meador J; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Sep; 13(9):1158-72. PubMed ID: 1700392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of the pacing site, procainamide, and lead configuration on the relationship between the upper limit of vulnerability and the defibrillation threshold.
    Fan W; Gotoh M; Chen PS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jun; 18(6):1279-84. PubMed ID: 7659583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of lidocaine on relation between defibrillation threshold and upper limit of vulnerability in open-chest dogs.
    Topham SL; Cha YM; Peters BB; Chen PS
    Circulation; 1992 Mar; 85(3):1146-51. PubMed ID: 1537112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of pacing site on ventricular fibrillation initiation by shocks during the vulnerable period.
    Idriss SF; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Am J Physiol; 1999 Nov; 277(5):H2065-82. PubMed ID: 10564163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of transvenous electrode polarity and waveform duration on the relationship between defibrillation threshold and upper limit of vulnerability.
    Huang J; KenKnight BH; Walcott GP; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1997 Aug; 96(4):1351-9. PubMed ID: 9286969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Myocardial vulnerability to T wave shocks: relation to shock strength, shock coupling interval, and dispersion of ventricular repolarization.
    Fabritz CL; Kirchhof PF; Behrens S; Zabel M; Franz MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1996 Mar; 7(3):231-42. PubMed ID: 8867297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of pacing rate and timing of defibrillation shock on the relation between the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of vulnerability in open chest dogs.
    Chen PS; Feld GK; Mower MM; Peters BB
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Nov; 18(6):1555-63. PubMed ID: 1939961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Successful implantation of cardiac defibrillators without induction of ventricular fibrillation using upper limit of vulnerability testing.
    Green UB; Garg A; Al-Kandari F; Ungab G; Tone L; Feld GK
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2003 Feb; 8(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 12652181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of the defibrillation threshold using the upper limit of vulnerability following defibrillator implantation.
    Kirilmaz A; Dokumaci B; Uzun M; Kilicaslan F; Dinckal MH; Yucel O; Karaca M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Jun; 28(6):498-505. PubMed ID: 15955181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of cardiac compression on defibrillation efficacy and the upper limit of vulnerability.
    Idriss SF; Anstadt MP; Anstadt GL; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1995 May; 6(5):368-78. PubMed ID: 7551306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shock-induced dispersion of ventricular repolarization: implications for the induction of ventricular fibrillation and the upper limit of vulnerability.
    Behrens S; Li C; Fabritz CL; Kirchhof PF; Franz MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 8(9):998-1008. PubMed ID: 9300297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal strength and number of shocks at upper limit of vulnerability testing required to predict high defibrillation threshold without inducing ventricular fibrillation.
    Takami K; Yoshida A; Fukuzawa K; Takei A; Kiuchi K; Kanda G; Kumagai H; Takami M; Torii-Tanaka S; Itoh M; Imamura K; Fujiwara R; Suzuki A; Nakanishi T; Yamashita S; Matsumoto A; Hirata K
    Circ J; 2013; 77(10):2490-6. PubMed ID: 23877733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.