These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7649005)

  • 1. Multiple-generator errors are unavoidable under model misspecification.
    Jewett DL; Zhang Z
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Aug; 95(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 7649005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Model misspecification detection by means of multiple generator errors, using the observed potential map.
    Zhang Z; Jewett DL
    Brain Topogr; 1994; 7(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 7803197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Insidious errors in dipole parameters due to shell model misspecification using multiple time-points.
    Zhang Z; Jewett DL; Goodwill G
    Brain Topogr; 1994; 6(4):283-98. PubMed ID: 7946928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DSL and MUSIC under model misspecification and noise-conditions.
    Zhang Z; Jewett DL
    Brain Topogr; 1994; 7(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 7696092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Insidious errors in dipole localization parameters at a single time-point due to model misspecification of number of shells.
    Zhang Z; Jewett DL
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 7681385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Equivalent dipole source localization of EEG and evoked potentials: sources of errors or sources with confidence?
    van Dijk BW; Spekreijse H; Yamazaki T
    Brain Topogr; 1993; 5(4):355-9. PubMed ID: 8357707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of anisotropic conductivity on EEG source reconstruction: investigations in a rabbit model.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Eiselt M; Giessler F; Flemming L; Anwander A; Knösche TR; Wolters CH; Dümpelmann M; Tuch DS; Reichenbach JR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1841-50. PubMed ID: 16941840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of head model in biomagnetic source localization.
    Tomita S; Kajihara S; Kondo Y; Yoshida Y; Shibata K; Kado H
    Brain Topogr; 1996; 8(3):337-40. PubMed ID: 8728429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Array response kernels for EEG and MEG in multilayer ellipsoidal geometry.
    Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1103-11. PubMed ID: 18334402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dipole source localization in the study of EP generators: a critique.
    Snyder AZ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991; 80(4):321-5. PubMed ID: 1713843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EEG generator--a model of potentials in a volume conductor.
    Avitan L; Teicher M; Abeles M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Nov; 102(5):3046-59. PubMed ID: 19710370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dipole source analysis. Linking scalp potentials to their generating neuronal structures.
    Gallinat J; Hegerl U
    Pharmacopsychiatry; 1994 Mar; 27(2):52-3. PubMed ID: 8029311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The localization of equivalent dipoles of EEG sources by the application of electrical field theory.
    Henderson CJ; Butler SR; Glass A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1975 Aug; 39(2):117-30. PubMed ID: 50209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inverting a Laplacian topography map.
    Klein SA
    Brain Topogr; 1993; 6(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 8260329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SEEG dipole source localization based on an empirical Bayesian approach taking into account forward model uncertainties.
    Cam SL; Ranta R; Caune V; Korats G; Koessler L; Maillard L; Louis-Dorr V
    Neuroimage; 2017 Jun; 153():1-15. PubMed ID: 28323161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
    Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Solving the EEG inverse problem based on space-time-frequency structured sparsity constraints.
    Castaño-Candamil S; Höhne J; Martínez-Vargas JD; An XW; Castellanos-Domínguez G; Haufe S
    Neuroimage; 2015 Sep; 118():598-612. PubMed ID: 26048621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Separation and identification of event-related potential components by brain electric source analysis.
    Scherg M; Picton TW
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1991; 42():24-37. PubMed ID: 1915020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Topographic representation of event-related potentials.
    Wong PK
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1991; 42():5-12. PubMed ID: 1915031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multivariate composite estimators: new ways to track signals with application to human cerebral potentials.
    Wang W; Begleiter H; Porjesz B
    Brain Topogr; 1994; 7(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 7803204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.