These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7650097)

  • 21. Bilingualism and adult differences in inhibitory mechanisms: evidence from a bilingual stroop task.
    Mohamed Zied K; Phillipe A; Pinon K; Havet-Thomassin V; Aubin G; Roy A; Le Gall D
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Apr; 54(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 15050787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cognitive bias in dizziness: emotional Stroop and autobiographical memories.
    Andersson G; Fredriksson M; Jansson M; Ingerholt C; Larsen HC
    Cogn Behav Ther; 2004; 33(4):208-20. PubMed ID: 15625795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Head-injured patients and control group: implicit versus explicit measures of frequency of occurrence.
    Vakil E; Biederman Y; Liran G; Groswasser Z; Aberbuch S
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1994 Aug; 16(4):539-46. PubMed ID: 7962358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attention and attentional shift efficiency in individuals with and without mental retardation.
    Bergen AM; Mosley JL
    Am J Ment Retard; 1994 May; 98(6):732-43. PubMed ID: 8054202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Recovery versus retest effects in attention after closed head injury.
    Spikman JM; Timmerman ME; Zomeren van AH; Deelman BG
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1999 Oct; 21(5):585-605. PubMed ID: 10572280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect.
    Algom D; Chajut E; Lev S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 15355142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Functional connectivity during Stroop task performance.
    Harrison BJ; Shaw M; Yücel M; Purcell R; Brewer WJ; Strother SC; Egan GF; Olver JS; Nathan PJ; Pantelis C
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):181-91. PubMed ID: 15588609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Color-word interference in relation to comparative compatibility: evidence for two sources of interference].
    Schulz T; Liebing D
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1991; 38(4):648-68. PubMed ID: 1785215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Stroop effects in persons with traumatic brain injury: selective attention, speed of processing, or color-naming? A meta-analysis.
    Ben-David BM; Nguyen LL; van Lieshout PH
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2011 Mar; 17(2):354-63. PubMed ID: 21320377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Use of the Hayling task to measure inhibition of prepotent responses in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease.
    Belleville S; Rouleau N; Van der Linden M
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 16757076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bulimic symptoms and mood predict food relevant Stroop interference in women with troubled eating patterns.
    Rofey DL; Corcoran KJ; Tran GQ
    Eat Behav; 2004 Jan; 5(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 15000952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of level of processing on perceptual and conceptual priming: control versus closed-head-injured patients.
    Vakil E; Sigal J
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 1997 Jul; 3(4):327-36. PubMed ID: 9260442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Enduring cognitive dysfunction in unipolar major depression: a test-retest study using the Stroop paradigm.
    Hammar A; Sørensen L; Ardal G; Oedegaard KJ; Kroken R; Roness A; Lund A
    Scand J Psychol; 2010 Aug; 51(4):304-8. PubMed ID: 20042028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Differential effects of aging on executive and automatic inhibition.
    Andrés P; Guerrini C; Phillips LH; Perfect TJ
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2008; 33(2):101-23. PubMed ID: 18443972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location.
    Cho YS; Lien MC; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):826-39. PubMed ID: 16846282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Oddball and incongruity effects during Stroop task performance: a comparative fMRI study on selective attention.
    Melcher T; Gruber O
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1121(1):136-49. PubMed ID: 17022954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stroop Color-Word Test performance in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
    Fisher LM; Freed DM; Corkin S
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1990 Oct; 12(5):745-58. PubMed ID: 2258434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Declarative and nondeclarative sequence learning tasks: closed-head injured patients versus control participants.
    Vakil E; Gordon Y; Birnstok S; Aberbuch S; Groswasser Z
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2001 Apr; 23(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 11309674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Proofreaders' decreased Stroop interference.
    Borzoni S; Hines T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Jun; 82(3 Pt 2):1104-6. PubMed ID: 8823877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Inhibition and facilitation in schizotypy.
    Cimino M; Haywood M
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2008 Feb; 30(2):187-98. PubMed ID: 18938670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.