These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 765128)

  • 21. IRB jurisdiction and limits on IRB actions.
    Hershey N; Cann CI; Rothman KJ
    IRB; 1985; 7(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Lay participation in medical policy making. II. Human experimentation committees: professional or representative?
    Veatch RM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1975 Oct; 5(5):31-40. PubMed ID: 1184371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using the brain dead for medical research.
    Martyn SR
    Utah Law Rev; 1986; 1986(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 11651917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Report says institutional review boards are conducting inadequate reviews.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Sep; 13(9):1-2. PubMed ID: 11660603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. FDA revises informed consent regulations for emergency research.
    Menasché A; Levine RJ
    IRB; 1995; 17(5-6):19-22. PubMed ID: 11653359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Informed consent: the FDA's perspective.
    Bagley G
    Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 11653141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multicenter trials and subject eligibility: should local IRBs play a role?
    Freedman B
    IRB; 1994; 16(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
    Cowan DH
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. If only it were so: medical physics, U.S. human radiation experiments, and the Final Report of the President's Advisory Committee (ACHRE).
    Martensen R
    Med Humanit Rev; 1997; 11(2):21-36. PubMed ID: 11645853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Research with radiation and healthy children: greater than minimal risk.
    Freeman WL
    IRB; 1994; 16(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 11652791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1991 Jun; 56(117):28003-18. PubMed ID: 10112214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How to interpret the federal policy for the protection of human subjects or "Common Rule" (Part A). [for the Working Group of the Human Subjects Research Subcommittee of the National Science and Technology Council].
    Shelton JD
    IRB; 1999; 21(6):6-9. PubMed ID: 11697393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Federal agency keeps review committee after public comments support continuation.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1997 Jan; 12(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Commission says institutional review boards should change procedures now.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Exempt research: procedures in the intramural research program of the National Institutes of Health.
    Wichman A; Mills D; Sandler AL
    IRB; 1996; 18(2):3-5. PubMed ID: 11654755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The IRB's role in assessing the generalizability of non-NIH-funded clinical trials.
    Weijer C
    IRB; 1998; 20(2-3):1-5. PubMed ID: 11656912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns.
    Kobasic DM
    J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The paradoxical case of payment as benefit to research subjects.
    Macklin R
    IRB; 1989; 11(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 11650284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Who shall decide when doctors disagree? A review of the legal development of informed consent and the implications of proposed lay review of human experimentation.
    Ratnoff MF
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):472-532. PubMed ID: 11661164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The human radiation experiments: the real issues.
    Mossman KL
    Health Phys; 1995 Jun; 68(6):757-60. PubMed ID: 7759252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.