These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7651502)
1. Energy department X-rays skeletons in Cold War closet. Reichhardt T Nature; 1995 Aug; 376(6542):627. PubMed ID: 7651502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. US radiation report fails to satisfy critics. Macilwain C Nature; 1995 Oct; 377(6549):470. PubMed ID: 7566133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. "The only feasible means." The Pentagon's ambivalent relationship with the Nuremberg Code. Moreno JD Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(5):11-9. PubMed ID: 8891703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proposed requirements for informed consent go beyond current federal regulations. Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiation doctors abused trust in the name of science. Kiernan V New Sci; 1995 Oct; 148(1999):8. PubMed ID: 11656493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. U.S. is urged to repay some in radiation tests. Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 1995 Jul; ():A11. PubMed ID: 11647079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Remedies for human subjects of cold war research: recommendations of the Advisory Committee. Mastroianni A; Kahn J J Law Med Ethics; 1996; 24(2):118-26. PubMed ID: 8945189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Payments to make amends for secret tests of radiation. Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 1996 Nov; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11647208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. Final rule. Fed Regist; 1991 Jun; 56(117):28003-18. PubMed ID: 10112214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Past radiation experiments may lead to new efforts for informed consent. Hosp Ethics; 1994; 10(2):13-5. PubMed ID: 10132144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. Reflections on a Presidential Commission. Faden R Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(5):5-10. PubMed ID: 8891702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Government could be sued over human experimentation problems. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1996 Oct; 11(10):6. PubMed ID: 11656530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The National Bioethics Advisory Commission: bridging the gaps in human subjects research protection. Childress JF J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):105-22. PubMed ID: 15573433 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Whatever made them do it? Estling R New Sci; 1995 Jan; 145(1961):48-9. PubMed ID: 11656388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiation and responsibility. Feinberg KR Washington Post; 1995 Oct; ():A23. PubMed ID: 11647088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The cold war experiments. Budiansky S; Goode EE; Gest T US News World Rep; 1994 Jan; 116(3):32-34, 36, 38. PubMed ID: 11659685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Adding to the canon: the final report. Meslin EM Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(5):34-6. PubMed ID: 11644871 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. US agencies split over inquiry into effects of radiation experiments. Macilwain C Nature; 1994 Apr; 368(6474):781. PubMed ID: 8159229 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. IRBs and research with human biological materials. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):2. PubMed ID: 11657556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]