These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7651558)

  • 1. Nursing practice implications of court decision.
    Nev Rnformation; 1995 Feb; 4(1):15. PubMed ID: 7651558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nursing practice implications of Supreme Court decision on nurses as supervisors.
    Colo Nurse; 1994 Dec; 94(4):4. PubMed ID: 7834666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The director of nursing and collective bargaining.
    Tice KS
    Superv Nurse; 1980 Sep; 11(9):34-8. PubMed ID: 6902503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Supreme Court decision affects bargaining rights of nurses.
    Furmidge ML; Barter M
    J Nurs Adm; 1994; 24(7-8):9-11. PubMed ID: 8057179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ANA, UAN fight to ensure workplace protection for RNs.
    Smith WC; Martin S
    Am J Nurs; 2002 Oct; 102(10):61-2. PubMed ID: 12394308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The professional association and collective bargaining.
    Colangelo M
    Superv Nurse; 1980 Sep; 11(9):27-32. PubMed ID: 6902502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The legality of nursing associations serving as collective bargaining agents: the Arundel case.
    Dolan AK
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1980; 5(1):25-54. PubMed ID: 7400572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Taft-Hartley amended: implications for nursing. The professional model.
    Cleland V
    Am J Nurs; 1975 Feb; 75(2):288-92. PubMed ID: 1037798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What is the Supreme Court doing to nursing?
    Wolfe S
    RN; 1994 Dec; 57(12):59-60, 63-4. PubMed ID: 7817141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Taft-Hartley amended: implications for nursing. The industrial model.
    Zimmerman A
    Am J Nurs; 1975 Feb; 75(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 1037797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anne Arundel decision prompts action by E&GW Commission.
    Loveless J
    Am Nurse; 1977 Dec; 9(12):1,8. PubMed ID: 244277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standards, collective bargaining, restructuring important issues for nursing service directors.
    Arnold P
    Am Nurse; 1976 Jun; 8(9):1-2. PubMed ID: 1046950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ANA presents oral argument before the NLRB on supervisory status of nurses.
    Ketter K
    Am Nurse; 1994; 26(10):1, 10. PubMed ID: 7810919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Supreme Court backs providers.
    Vaccaro PL; Bryant MR
    Provider; 1994 Nov; 20(11):63-4. PubMed ID: 10138679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Collective bargaining: what's a director of nursing to do?
    Rosasco LC
    Hospitals; 1974 Sep; 48(18):79-80, 82-3, 113. PubMed ID: 4416955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Law restores bargaining rights.
    Am Nurse; 1991; 23(7):2. PubMed ID: 1877791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Administrative reviews: nursing.
    Kinsella CR
    Hospitals; 1975 Apr; 49(7):101-5. PubMed ID: 1090496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Many of us think it is time to stand together.
    Rotkovitch R
    Am J Nurs; 1976 Dec; 76(12):1923-4. PubMed ID: 1050145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Collective bargaining and the nursing profession.
    Flanagan L
    ANA Publ; 1983; (D-72 E):1-30. PubMed ID: 6362475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of the recent NLRB ruling about appropriate health-care bargaining units for registered nurses.
    Rowe S
    Mass Nurse; 1989 Sep; 59(8):10. PubMed ID: 2779393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.