These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7652013)

  • 1. Analysis of signal propagation in optically coupled detectors for digital mammography: I. Phosphor screens.
    Maidment AD; Yaffe MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 May; 40(5):877-89. PubMed ID: 7652013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of signal propagation in optically coupled detectors for digital mammography: II. Lens and fibre optics.
    Maidment AD; Yaffe MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Mar; 41(3):475-93. PubMed ID: 8778827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comments on 'MTF evaluation of a phosphor-coated CCD for x-ray imaging'.
    Okkalides D
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Jun; 42(6):1209-10. PubMed ID: 9194140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The physics of computed radiography: measurements of pulse height spectra of photostimulable phosphor screens using prompt luminescence.
    Watt KN; Yan K; DeCrescenzo G; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3589-98. PubMed ID: 16475757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The imaging performance of compact Lu2O3:Eu powdered phosphor screens: Monte Carlo simulation for applications in mammography.
    Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1985-97. PubMed ID: 19610287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
    Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Digital storage phosphor mammography in a magnification technic: experimental studies for spatial resolution and for detection of microcalcifications].
    Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Hundertmark C; Sachs J; Gruhl T; Sperner W; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1997 Aug; 167(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 9333359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. X-ray imaging with amorphous selenium: theoretical feasibility of the liquid crystal light valve for radiography.
    Rieppo PK; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1279-91. PubMed ID: 9284252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors.
    Samei E
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1747-57. PubMed ID: 12906192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of the Y2O3:Eu3+ scintillator for application in medical x-ray detectors and image receptors.
    Cavouras D; Kandarakis I; Panayiotakis GS; Evangelou EK; Nomicos CD
    Med Phys; 1996 Dec; 23(12):1965-75. PubMed ID: 8994161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrast-detail detectability analysis: comparison of a digital spot mammography system and an analog screen-film mammography system.
    Liu H; Fajardo LL; Barrett JR; Baxter RA
    Acad Radiol; 1997 Mar; 4(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 9084777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with conventional screen film system (SFS), digital phosphor storage plate in/without magnification technique (CR) and digital CCD-technique (CCD).
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Säbel M; Böhner C; Dobritz M; Wenkel E; Bautz W
    Rontgenpraxis; 2001; 54(4):123-6. PubMed ID: 11883115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lag and ghosting in a clinical flat-panel selenium digital mammography system.
    Bloomquist AK; Yaffe MJ; Mawdsley GE; Hunter DM; Beideck DJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2998-3005. PubMed ID: 16964878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the information content of phosphor produced medical images: application to Zn2SiO4:Mn phosphor.
    Cavouras D; Kandarakis I; Nomicos CD; Panayiotakis GS; Fezoulidis I
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2000 Jan; 52(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 10670931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrated model for estimating phosphor signal and noise transfer characteristics on medical images: application to CdPO3Cl:Mn phosphor screens.
    Cavouras D; Kandarakis I; Panayiotakis GS; Nomicos CD
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2002 May; 40(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 12195972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scintillating fiber optic screens: a comparison of MTF, light conversion efficiency, and emission angle with Gd2O2S:Tb screens.
    Yu T; Sabol JM; Seibert JA; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 1997 Feb; 24(2):279-85. PubMed ID: 9048369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a developmental detector for digital mammography.
    Williams MB; Simoni PU; Smilowitz L; Stanton M; Phillips W; Stewart A
    Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2273-85. PubMed ID: 10587208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anisotropic imaging performance in breast tomosynthesis.
    Badano A; Kyprianou IS; Jennings RJ; Sempau J
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4076-91. PubMed ID: 18074617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image information transfer properties of x-ray intensifying screens in the energy range from 17 to 320 keV.
    Ginzburg A; Dick CE
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(4):1013-21. PubMed ID: 8413008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling granular phosphor screens by Monte Carlo methods.
    Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS; Cavouras DA; Delis HB; Panayiotakis GS
    Med Phys; 2006 Dec; 33(12):4502-14. PubMed ID: 17278802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.