144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7652013)
1. Analysis of signal propagation in optically coupled detectors for digital mammography: I. Phosphor screens.
Maidment AD; Yaffe MJ
Phys Med Biol; 1995 May; 40(5):877-89. PubMed ID: 7652013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of signal propagation in optically coupled detectors for digital mammography: II. Lens and fibre optics.
Maidment AD; Yaffe MJ
Phys Med Biol; 1996 Mar; 41(3):475-93. PubMed ID: 8778827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comments on 'MTF evaluation of a phosphor-coated CCD for x-ray imaging'.
Okkalides D
Phys Med Biol; 1997 Jun; 42(6):1209-10. PubMed ID: 9194140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The physics of computed radiography: measurements of pulse height spectra of photostimulable phosphor screens using prompt luminescence.
Watt KN; Yan K; DeCrescenzo G; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3589-98. PubMed ID: 16475757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The imaging performance of compact Lu2O3:Eu powdered phosphor screens: Monte Carlo simulation for applications in mammography.
Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS
Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1985-97. PubMed ID: 19610287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Digital storage phosphor mammography in a magnification technic: experimental studies for spatial resolution and for detection of microcalcifications].
Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Hundertmark C; Sachs J; Gruhl T; Sperner W; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1997 Aug; 167(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 9333359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. X-ray imaging with amorphous selenium: theoretical feasibility of the liquid crystal light valve for radiography.
Rieppo PK; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1279-91. PubMed ID: 9284252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors.
Samei E
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1747-57. PubMed ID: 12906192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of the Y2O3:Eu3+ scintillator for application in medical x-ray detectors and image receptors.
Cavouras D; Kandarakis I; Panayiotakis GS; Evangelou EK; Nomicos CD
Med Phys; 1996 Dec; 23(12):1965-75. PubMed ID: 8994161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-detail detectability analysis: comparison of a digital spot mammography system and an analog screen-film mammography system.
Liu H; Fajardo LL; Barrett JR; Baxter RA
Acad Radiol; 1997 Mar; 4(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 9084777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with conventional screen film system (SFS), digital phosphor storage plate in/without magnification technique (CR) and digital CCD-technique (CCD).
Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Säbel M; Böhner C; Dobritz M; Wenkel E; Bautz W
Rontgenpraxis; 2001; 54(4):123-6. PubMed ID: 11883115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lag and ghosting in a clinical flat-panel selenium digital mammography system.
Bloomquist AK; Yaffe MJ; Mawdsley GE; Hunter DM; Beideck DJ
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2998-3005. PubMed ID: 16964878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the information content of phosphor produced medical images: application to Zn2SiO4:Mn phosphor.
Cavouras D; Kandarakis I; Nomicos CD; Panayiotakis GS; Fezoulidis I
Appl Radiat Isot; 2000 Jan; 52(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 10670931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integrated model for estimating phosphor signal and noise transfer characteristics on medical images: application to CdPO3Cl:Mn phosphor screens.
Cavouras D; Kandarakis I; Panayiotakis GS; Nomicos CD
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2002 May; 40(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 12195972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Scintillating fiber optic screens: a comparison of MTF, light conversion efficiency, and emission angle with Gd2O2S:Tb screens.
Yu T; Sabol JM; Seibert JA; Boone JM
Med Phys; 1997 Feb; 24(2):279-85. PubMed ID: 9048369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a developmental detector for digital mammography.
Williams MB; Simoni PU; Smilowitz L; Stanton M; Phillips W; Stewart A
Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2273-85. PubMed ID: 10587208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anisotropic imaging performance in breast tomosynthesis.
Badano A; Kyprianou IS; Jennings RJ; Sempau J
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4076-91. PubMed ID: 18074617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image information transfer properties of x-ray intensifying screens in the energy range from 17 to 320 keV.
Ginzburg A; Dick CE
Med Phys; 1993; 20(4):1013-21. PubMed ID: 8413008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modeling granular phosphor screens by Monte Carlo methods.
Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS; Cavouras DA; Delis HB; Panayiotakis GS
Med Phys; 2006 Dec; 33(12):4502-14. PubMed ID: 17278802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
