These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7652013)

  • 21. System considerations in CCD-based x-ray imaging for digital chest radiography and digital mammography.
    Hejazi S; Trauernicht DP
    Med Phys; 1997 Feb; 24(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 9048370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Analysis of the spatial-frequency-dependent DQE of optically coupled digital mammography detectors.
    Maidment AD; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1994 Jun; 21(6):721-9. PubMed ID: 7935207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Monte Carlo study on the imaging performance of powder Lu2SiO5:Ce phosphor screens under x-ray excitation: comparison with Gd2O2S:Tb screens.
    Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS; Cavouras DA; Delis HB; Panayiotakis GS
    Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1724-33. PubMed ID: 17555254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Y2O2S:Eu phosphor screens evaluation.
    Giakoumakis GE; Nomicos CD; Skountzos P; Koutroubas S; Zisos A; Yiakoumakis EN; Katsarioti MC; Kaliakatsos JA; Rovithi M; Panayiotakis GS
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 8455516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A slot-scanned photodiode-array/CCD hybrid detector for digital mammography.
    Mainprize JG; Ford NL; Yin S; Tümer T; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2002 Feb; 29(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 11865992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Methods to calculate the lens efficiency in optically coupled CCD x-ray imaging systems.
    Liu H; Karellas A; Harris LJ; D'Orsi CJ
    Med Phys; 1994 Jul; 21(7):1193-5. PubMed ID: 7968853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Relative speeds of Kodak computed radiography phosphors and screen-film systems.
    Huda W; Rill LN; Bruner AP
    Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1621-8. PubMed ID: 9350716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Image quality, lesion detection, and diagnostic efficacy in digital mammography: full-field digital mammography versus computed radiography-based mammography using digital storage phosphor plates.
    Schueller G; Riedl CC; Mallek R; Eibenberger K; Langenberger H; Kaindl E; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Rudas M; Helbich TH
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):487-96. PubMed ID: 17890036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Lubberts effect in columnar phosphors.
    Badano A; Gagne RM; Gallas BD; Jennings RJ; Boswell JS; Myers KJ
    Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):3122-31. PubMed ID: 15587665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1205-30. PubMed ID: 7480666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fundamentals of digital mammography: physics, technology and practical considerations.
    Smith A
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(5):18-24, 26-31; quiz 32-4. PubMed ID: 14603590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Digital image magnification mammography with the storage-screen technique. Standardized and findings-oriented image processing parameters].
    Hundertmark C; Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Grabbe E
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 May; 7(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 9296608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Direct digital magnification mammography with a large-surface detector made of amorphous silicon].
    Hermann KP; Hundertmark C; Funke M; von Brenndorff A; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 10370416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measurement of the effective size of the input phosphor of an x-ray image intensifier.
    Feldman A; Cox R; Rosser J
    Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1641-2. PubMed ID: 9350719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with a conventional screen film system (SFS) and a new full-field digital mammography unit (DR) with a-Se-detector.
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E; Schmid A; Imhoff K; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):766-8. PubMed ID: 12811687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Study of a prototype high quantum efficiency thick scintillation crystal video-electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2783-91. PubMed ID: 16964854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Evaluation of the edge enhancement effect of phase contrast imaging using newly-developed photostimulable phosphor plate].
    Matsuo S; Morishita J; Katafuchi T; Fujita H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(5):563-72. PubMed ID: 22687901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparative study of computed radiography-based mammography using digital phosphor storage plate and full field digital mammography.
    Chelliah KK; Tamanang S; Bt Elias LS; Ying KY
    Indian J Med Sci; 2013; 67(1-2):23-8. PubMed ID: 24178338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Detectors for digital mammography.
    Yaffe MJ; Mainprize JG
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Aug; 3(4):309-24. PubMed ID: 15270582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. On the noise variance of a digital mammography system.
    Burgess A
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):1987-95. PubMed ID: 15305451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.