These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7652013)

  • 41. Monte Carlo optimization of metal/phosphor screens at megavoltage energies.
    Radcliffe T; Barnea G; Wowk B; Rajapakshe R; Shalev S
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(4):1161-9. PubMed ID: 8413026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. For mammography, it's digital vs. screen-film.
    D'Orsi CJ; Karellas A
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D16-8. PubMed ID: 10724730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Dosage loads and quality of the image in mammography].
    Kozlov AP; Shishov VA; Telesh LV; Fedorov IuA
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1986; (3):74-9. PubMed ID: 3750831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Breast implants. Phosphor screens].
    Crevecoeur A
    Rev Med Liege; 1998 Dec; 53(12):749-51. PubMed ID: 9927871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Interstitial lung diseases. A comparative study between a film-screen combination and a digital storage phosphor technic].
    Dölken W; Chowanetz W; Horwitz AE; Krahe T; Landwehr P; Lackner K
    Rofo; 1992 Jan; 156(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 1733476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An investigation of the imaging characteristics of the Y2O2S:Eu3+ phosphor for application in X-ray detectors of digital mammography.
    Cavouras D; Kandarakis I; Panayiotakis GS; Kanellopoulos E; Triantis D; Nomicos CD
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1998 Aug; 49(8):931-7. PubMed ID: 9650263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A new needle-crystalline computed radiography detector.
    Leblans P; Struye L; Willems P
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):117-20. PubMed ID: 10847378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effect of phosphor persistence on image quality in digital x-ray scanning systems.
    Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1998 Dec; 25(12):2440-54. PubMed ID: 9874838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Storage phosphor digital mammography.
    Hogge JP; Freedman MT
    Semin Roentgenol; 1997 Jan; 32(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 9035278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Storage phosphor direct magnification mammography in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography--a phantom study.
    Funke M; Breiter N; Hermann KP; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
    Br J Radiol; 1998 May; 71(845):528-34. PubMed ID: 9691898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Radiographic mottle and patient exposure in mammography.
    Barnes GT; Chakraborty DP
    Radiology; 1982 Dec; 145(3):815-21. PubMed ID: 7146416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
    Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Current status and issues of screening digital mammography in Japan.
    Yamada T
    Breast Cancer; 2010 Jul; 17(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 20143190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A fast low-noise line scan x-ray detector.
    Glüer CC; Dix WR; Engelke K; Graeff W; Kupper W; Stellmaschek KH
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 2921989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A comparison of the imaging properties of CCD-based devices used for small field digital mammography.
    Evans DS; Workman A; Payne M
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Jan; 47(1):117-35. PubMed ID: 11814221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Resolution at oblique incidence angles of a flat panel imager for breast tomosynthesis.
    Mainprize JG; Bloomquist AK; Kempston MP; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3159-64. PubMed ID: 17022208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Temporomandibular joint pantomography using charge-coupled device, photostimulable phosphor, and film receptors: a comparison.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):9-13. PubMed ID: 10342155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A method to evaluate the performance of X-ray imaging scintillators by means of the brightness-sharpness index (BSI).
    Cavouras D; Kandarakis I; Prassopoulos P; Kanellopoulos E; Nomicos CD; Panayiotakis GS
    Acta Radiol; 1999 Mar; 40(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 10080737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Characteristics of x-ray intensifying screens for mammography].
    Gorelik FG; Kon'kova GV
    Med Tekh; 1985; (1):48-51. PubMed ID: 3974436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluating phosphors for use in X-ray image detectors by the effective performance index (EPI) method: application to Eu3+ activated yttrium based materials.
    Cavouras D; Kandarakis I; Prassopoulos P; Kanellopoulos E; Nomicos CD; Panayiotakis GS
    Technol Health Care; 1999; 7(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 10218600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.