These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7655475)

  • 41. Analysis of foot motion during running using a joint co-ordinate system.
    Soutas-Little RW; Beavis GC; Verstraete MC; Markus TL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1987 Jun; 19(3):285-93. PubMed ID: 3600243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Forefoot angle determines duration and amplitude of pronation during walking.
    Monaghan GM; Lewis CL; Hsu WH; Saltzman E; Hamill J; Holt KG
    Gait Posture; 2013 May; 38(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23117096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Distinct hip and rearfoot kinematics in female runners with a history of tibial stress fracture.
    Milner CE; Hamill J; Davis IS
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2010 Feb; 40(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 20118528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The relationship between rearfoot, tibial and hip kinematics in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome.
    Barton CJ; Levinger P; Crossley KM; Webster KE; Menz HB
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Aug; 27(7):702-5. PubMed ID: 22436492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Multi-segment foot kinematics and ground reaction forces during gait of individuals with plantar fasciitis.
    Chang R; Rodrigues PA; Van Emmerik RE; Hamill J
    J Biomech; 2014 Aug; 47(11):2571-7. PubMed ID: 24992816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of laterally wedged foot orthoses on rearfoot and hip mechanics in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis.
    Butler RJ; Barrios JA; Royer T; Davis IS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2009 Jun; 33(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 19367514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The role of footwear-independent variations in rearfoot movement on impact attenuation in heel-toe running.
    Kersting UG; Kriwet A; Brüggemann GP
    Res Sports Med; 2006; 14(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 16869137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of orthotics and footwear on static rearfoot kinematics.
    Winkelmeyer M; Nelson B; Southworth T; Carlson K
    J Sports Sci Med; 2006; 5(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 24353465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Frontal plane multi-segment foot kinematics in high- and low-arched females during dynamic loading tasks.
    Powell DW; Long B; Milner CE; Zhang S
    Hum Mov Sci; 2011 Feb; 30(1):105-14. PubMed ID: 21220174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Influence of a commercially available orthotic device on rearfoot eversion and vertical ground reaction force when running in military footwear.
    Dixon SJ
    Mil Med; 2007 Apr; 172(4):446-50. PubMed ID: 17484322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Discrete and continuous joint coupling relationships in uninjured recreational runners.
    Dierks TA; Davis I
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Jun; 22(5):581-91. PubMed ID: 17367903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The effect of forefoot and arch posting orthotic designs on first metatarsophalangeal joint kinematics during gait.
    Nawoczenski DA; Ludewig PM
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2004 Jun; 34(6):317-27. PubMed ID: 15233393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Influence of shod/unshod condition and running speed on foot-strike patterns, inversion/eversion, and vertical foot rotation in endurance runners.
    Muñoz-Jimenez M; Latorre-Román PA; Soto-Hermoso VM; García-Pinillos F
    J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(19):2035-42. PubMed ID: 25812907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The effect of foot orthoses on transverse tibial rotation during walking.
    McPoil TG; Cornwall MW
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2000 Jan; 90(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 10659526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Transfer of movement between calcaneus and tibia in vitro.
    Hintermann B; Nigg BM; Sommer C; Cole GK
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 1994 Nov; 9(6):349-55. PubMed ID: 23916353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of arch height of the foot on angular motion of the lower extremities in running.
    Nigg BM; Cole GK; Nachbauer W
    J Biomech; 1993 Aug; 26(8):909-16. PubMed ID: 8349716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The influence of sole wedges on frontal plane knee kinetics, in isolation and in combination with representative rigid and semi-rigid ankle-foot-orthoses.
    Schmalz T; Blumentritt S; Drewitz H; Freslier M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Jul; 21(6):631-9. PubMed ID: 16567026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A comparison of semi-custom and custom foot orthotic devices in high- and low-arched individuals during walking.
    Zifchock RA; Davis I
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Dec; 23(10):1287-93. PubMed ID: 18757124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of 7-degree rearfoot varus and valgus wedging on rearfoot kinematics and kinetics during the stance phase of walking.
    Pascual Huerta J; Ropa Moreno JM; Kirby KA; García Carmona FJ; Orejana García AM
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2009; 99(5):415-21. PubMed ID: 19767548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The effects of running in an exerted state on lower extremity kinematics and joint timing.
    Dierks TA; Davis IS; Hamill J
    J Biomech; 2010 Nov; 43(15):2993-8. PubMed ID: 20663506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.