310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7658175)
1. The inherent paternalism in clinical practice.
Wulff HR
J Med Philos; 1995 Jun; 20(3):299-311. PubMed ID: 7658175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Freedom and democracy in health care ethics: is the cart before the horse?
Meaney ME
Theor Med; 1996 Dec; 17(4):399-414. PubMed ID: 9001131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The ideal of shared decision making between physicians and patients.
Brock DW
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1991 Mar; 1(1):28-47. PubMed ID: 10113819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Philosophical foundations of respect for autonomy.
Gauthier CC
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1993 Mar; 3(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 10124848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discretionary power, lies, and broken trust: justification and discomfort.
Potter N
Theor Med; 1996 Dec; 17(4):329-52. PubMed ID: 9001127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Autonomy, beneficence, and informed consent: rethinking the connections. II.
Shatz D
Cancer Invest; 1986; 4(4):353-61. PubMed ID: 3768761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The conflict between autonomy and beneficence in medical ethics: proposal for a resolution.
Pellegrino ED; Thomasma DC
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1987; 3():23-46. PubMed ID: 11645600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent--must it remain a fairy tale?
Katz J
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1994; 10():69-91. PubMed ID: 10134817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Duty and caring in the age of informed consent and medical science: unlocking Peabody's secret.
Katz J
Humane Med; 1992 Jul; 8(3):187-97. PubMed ID: 11651314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The irreducibly clinical character of bioethics.
Wear S
J Med Philos; 1991 Feb; 16(1):53-70. PubMed ID: 2010721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The promise of the beneficience model for medical ethics.
Beauchamp TL
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1990; 6():145-55. PubMed ID: 10105336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A critique of traditional relationship models.
Loewy RS
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1994; 3(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 8032516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Conceptual and moral disputes about futile and useful treatments.
Kopelman LM
J Med Philos; 1995 Apr; 20(2):109-21. PubMed ID: 7636418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Autonomy, beneficence, and informed consent: rethinking the connections. I.
Shatz D
Cancer Invest; 1986; 4(3):257-69. PubMed ID: 3719412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Heroics and healing.
MacLeod C
HEC Forum; 1990; 2(5):335-41. PubMed ID: 10106996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical issues in gynecology.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Ceska Gynekol; 1998 Apr; 63(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 9650401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Examining consent within the patient-doctor relationship.
Habiba MA
J Med Ethics; 2000 Jun; 26(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 10860210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physician-patient encounters "on a darkling plain.
Katz J
West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):207-26. PubMed ID: 11649912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Rational non-interventional paternalism: why doctors ought to make judgments of what is best for their patients.
Savulescu J
J Med Ethics; 1995 Dec; 21(6):327-31. PubMed ID: 8778455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Paternalism modernised.
Weiss GB
J Med Ethics; 1985 Dec; 11(4):184-7. PubMed ID: 4078856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
