These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7658389)

  • 1. Tensile bond strength of polyvinyl siloxane impressions bonded to a custom tray as a function of drying time: Part I.
    Cho GC; Donovan TE; Chee WW; White SN
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 May; 73(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 7658389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of custom tray material type and adhesive drying time on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
    Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Brown JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 8003192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of custom tray material type and surface treatment on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
    Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Bosser MJ; Nafso AJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 8397701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of disinfection of custom tray materials on adhesive properties of several impression material systems.
    Thompson GA; Vermilyea SG; Agar JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec; 72(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 7853264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part II.
    Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 1800721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Properties of the tray adhesive of an addition polymerizing silicone to impression tray materials.
    Sulong MZ; Setchell DJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Dec; 66(6):743-7. PubMed ID: 1805022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
    Payne JA; Pereira BP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors that affect the adhesion of two irreversible hydrocolloid materials to two custom tray materials.
    Smith SJ; McCord JF; Macfarlane TV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):423-30. PubMed ID: 12447220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of custom tray material type and fabrication technique on tensile bond strength of impression material adhesive systems.
    Abdullah MA; Talic YF
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Mar; 30(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 12588506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of reactive adhesives on the tensile bond strength of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials to methyl methacrylate tray material.
    Ona M; Takahashi H; Sato M; Igarashi Y; Wakabayashi N
    Dent Mater J; 2010 May; 29(3):336-40. PubMed ID: 20484844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of tray material and surface condition on the shear bond strength of impression materials.
    Wang RR; Nguyen T; Boyle AM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 8809248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The bond strength of elastomer tray adhesives to thermoplastic and acrylic resin tray materials.
    Hogans WR; Agar JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Apr; 67(4):541-3. PubMed ID: 1507140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adhesion of elastomeric impression materials to trays.
    Bindra B; Heath JR
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Jan; 24(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 9049922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of different adhesives on vinyl polysiloxane bond strength to two tray materials.
    Peregrina A; Land MF; Wandling C; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 16126072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part I.
    Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 1774680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Linear dimensional accuracy of a polyvinyl siloxane of varying viscosities using different impression techniques.
    Mishra S; Chowdhary R
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2010 Aug; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25427185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bond strength of two nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials bonded to two thermoplastic resin tray materials.
    Payne JA; Pereira BP
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Dec; 74(6):563-8. PubMed ID: 8778378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    Hoyos A; Soderholm KJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21210004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of impression tray design and impression technique upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
    Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Taylor WG
    J Dent; 1991 Oct; 19(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 1806594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Al-Athel MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 18784860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.