These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7659208)

  • 1. The effectiveness of the Navy's Hearing Conservation Program.
    Wolgemuth KS; Luttrell WE; Kamhi AG; Wark DJ
    Mil Med; 1995 May; 160(5):219-22. PubMed ID: 7659208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noise-induced hearing loss among U.S. Air Force cryptolinguists.
    Ritter DC; Perkins JL
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Jun; 72(6):546-52. PubMed ID: 11398819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The contribution of focus groups in the evaluation of hearing conservation program (HCP) effectiveness.
    Prince MM; Colligan MJ; Stephenson CM; Bischoff BJ
    J Safety Res; 2004; 35(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 14992850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A study on compliance to hearing conservation programme among industries in Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.
    Nor Saleha IT; Noor Hassim I
    Ind Health; 2006 Oct; 44(4):584-91. PubMed ID: 17085919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A demonstrated positive effect of a hearing conservation program in the Swedish armed forces.
    Muhr P; Johnson AC; Skoog B; Rosenhall U
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(3):168-72. PubMed ID: 26754548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An epidemiologic method for assessing the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs using audiometric data.
    Adera T; Donahue AM; Malit BD; Gaydos JC
    Mil Med; 1993 Nov; 158(11):698-701. PubMed ID: 8284053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy and safety of N-acetylcysteine in prevention of noise induced hearing loss: a randomized clinical trial.
    Kopke R; Slade MD; Jackson R; Hammill T; Fausti S; Lonsbury-Martin B; Sanderson A; Dreisbach L; Rabinowitz P; Torre P; Balough B
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():40-50. PubMed ID: 25620313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of the U.S. Air Force's detailed follow-up audiometric examination program.
    Meyer GD; Wirth DB
    Mil Med; 1993 Sep; 158(9):603-5. PubMed ID: 8232998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Navy Hearing Conservation Program: threshold shifts in enlisted personnel, 1995-1999.
    Bohnker BK; Page JC; Rovig G; Betts LS; Sack DM
    Mil Med; 2002 Jan; 167(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 11799813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using the Navy's Occupational Health Information Management System and Medical Query Language to assess hearing loss.
    Helmkamp JC; Seidman JH
    Mil Med; 1988 Jan; 153(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 3126413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk Factors for Hearing Decrement Among U.S. Air Force Aviation-Related Personnel.
    Greenwell BM; Tvaryanas AP; Maupin GM
    Aerosp Med Hum Perform; 2018 Feb; 89(2):80-86. PubMed ID: 29463351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Costs and effectiveness of hearing conservation programs at 14 US metal manufacturing facilities.
    Sayler SK; Rabinowitz PM; Cantley LF; Galusha D; Neitzel RL
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Feb; 57(sup1):S3-S11. PubMed ID: 29216778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of military service on auditory health and the efficacy of a Hearing Conservation Program.
    Muhr P; Rosenhall U
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(53):320-7. PubMed ID: 21768736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prevention of noise-induced hearing loss in the Canadian military.
    Pelausa EO; Abel SM; Simard J; Dempsey I
    J Otolaryngol; 1995 Oct; 24(5):271-80. PubMed ID: 8537985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hearing conservation measures of effectiveness across the Department of Defense.
    Batchelor EA; Wolff GG; McKenna EA; Williams DA
    MSMR; 2020 Jul; 27(7):2-6. PubMed ID: 32726108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of exposure to noise in seafarers on several types of vessels in Polish Merchant Navy.
    Szczepański C; Otto B
    Bull Inst Marit Trop Med Gdynia; 1995; 46(1-4):13-7. PubMed ID: 8727463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of basic military training on hearing in the Singapore Armed Forces.
    Teo KJ; Chia SE; Tan TC; Ali SM
    Singapore Med J; 2008 Mar; 49(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 18363008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Criteria for managing audiometric data in occupational hearing conservation.
    Delaney CM
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 1994; 41():33-6. PubMed ID: 8602541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of hearing conservation programs on incidence of noise-induced hearing loss in Canadian workers.
    Davies H; Marion S; Teschke K
    Am J Ind Med; 2008 Dec; 51(12):923-31. PubMed ID: 18726988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hearing loss in the Royal Norwegian Navy: A longitudinal study.
    Irgens-Hansen K; Baste V; Bråtveit M; Lind O; Koefoed VF; Moen BE
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(82):157-65. PubMed ID: 27157689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.