These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7659406)

  • 1. A clinical trial of the SUN SK-2000 computer-assisted videokeratoscope.
    Dave TN; Fowler CW; Elawad ME; Dunne MC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 Mar; 15(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 7659406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corneal topography with Scheimpflug imaging and videokeratography: comparative study of normal eyes.
    Read SA; Collins MJ; Iskander DR; Davis BA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jun; 35(6):1072-81. PubMed ID: 19465294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref/Keratometer WAM-5500.
    Sheppard AL; Davies LN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Mar; 30(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 20444118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A pilot study on the measurement of central posterior corneal radius in Hong Kong Chinese using Purkinje image technique.
    Lam AK; Douthwaite WA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Jan; 17(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 9135815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of Orbscan II posterior corneal curvature measurement for intraocular lens power calculation.
    Leyland M
    Eye (Lond); 2004 Apr; 18(4):357-60. PubMed ID: 15069429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A review of mathematical descriptors of corneal asphericity].
    Gatinel D; Haouat M; Hoang-Xuan T
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2002 Jan; 25(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 11965125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a clinical aberrometer for lower-order accuracy and repeatability, higher-order repeatability, and instrument myopia.
    Salmon TO; van de Pol C
    Optometry; 2005 Aug; 76(8):461-72. PubMed ID: 16150413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer-assisted corneal topography: accuracy and reproducibility of the topographic modeling system.
    Legeais JM; Ren Q; Simon G; Parel JM
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1993; 9(5):347-57. PubMed ID: 8241039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance in specular reflection and slit-imaging corneal topography.
    Braaf B; Dubbelman M; van der Heijde RG; Sicam VA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 May; 86(5):467-75. PubMed ID: 19342978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the EyeSys model II computerized videokeratoscope. Part I: Clinical assessment.
    Dave T; Ruston D; Fowler C
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Sep; 75(9):647-55. PubMed ID: 9778697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Clinical experiences with the hand-held keratometer].
    Wassill KH; Dick B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1995 Aug; 207(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 7474779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K autorefractor.
    Davies LN; Mallen EA; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Apr; 80(4):320-4. PubMed ID: 12692490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modification, calibration, and comparative testing of an automated surgical keratometer.
    Simon G; Parel JM; Nose I; Lee W
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1991; 7(2):151-60. PubMed ID: 2043560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of a videokeratoscope and an autokeratometer as predictors of the optimum back surface curves of rigid corneal contact lenses.
    Douthwaite W; Pardhan S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Sep; 17(5):409-13. PubMed ID: 9390367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of curvature and aberrometric measurements of the posterior corneal surface in normal eyes using Scheimpflug photography.
    Piñero DP; Saenz González C; Alió JL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 19101433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of keratometry in 6-year-old children.
    Huynh SC; Mai TQ; Kifley A; Wang JJ; Rose KA; Mitchell P
    Cornea; 2006 May; 25(4):383-7. PubMed ID: 16670473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Corneal power and astigmatism in Down syndrome.
    Little JA; Woodhouse JM; Saunders KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 86(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 19390470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regular and irregular refractive powers of the front and back surfaces of the cornea.
    Oshika T; Tomidokoro A; Tsuji H
    Exp Eye Res; 1998 Oct; 67(4):443-7. PubMed ID: 9820792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consideration of the posterior corneal curvature for assessment of corneal power after myopic LASIK.
    Langenbucher A; Torres F; Behrens A; Suarez E; Haigis W; Seitz B
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Jun; 82(3 Pt 1):264-9. PubMed ID: 15115446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short-term repeatability of hand-held keratometry measurements.
    Shin JA; Manny RE; Kleinstein RN; Mutti DO; Zadnik K
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Apr; 76(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 10333188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.