These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7659576)

  • 1. High voltage shock induced cellular electrophysiological effects: transient refractoriness and bimodal changes in action potential duration.
    Li HG; Jones DL; Yee R; Klein GJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jun; 18(6):1225-35. PubMed ID: 7659576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of monophasic and biphasic shocks on action potentials during ventricular fibrillation in dogs.
    Zhou X; Wolf PD; Rollins DL; Afework Y; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circ Res; 1993 Aug; 73(2):325-34. PubMed ID: 8330375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevention of action potentials during extracellular electrical stimulation of long duration.
    Zhou X; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 8(7):779-89. PubMed ID: 9255685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship between "extension of refractoriness" and probability of successful defibrillation.
    Tovar OH; Jones JL
    Am J Physiol; 1997 Feb; 272(2 Pt 2):H1011-9. PubMed ID: 9124409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biphasic defibrillation waveforms reduce shock-induced response duration dispersion between low and high shock intensities.
    Tovar OH; Jones JL
    Circ Res; 1995 Aug; 77(2):430-8. PubMed ID: 7614727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Defibrillation shocks produce different effects on Purkinje fibers and ventricular muscle: implications for successful defibrillation, refibrillation and postshock arrhythmia.
    Li HG; Jones DL; Yee R; Klein GJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Aug; 22(2):607-14. PubMed ID: 8335836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of sotalol and acute ventricular dilatation on action potential duration and dispersion of repolarization after defibrillation shocks.
    Kirchhof P; Milberg P; Eckardt L; Breithardt G; Haverkamp W
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 2003 Apr; 41(4):640-8. PubMed ID: 12658067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Defibrillation shocks increase myocardial pacing threshold: an intracellular microelectrode study.
    Li HG; Jones DL; Yee R; Klein GJ
    Am J Physiol; 1991 Jun; 260(6 Pt 2):H1973-9. PubMed ID: 2058729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Refractory interval after transcardiac shocks during ventricular fibrillation.
    Sweeney RJ; Gill RM; Reid PR
    Circulation; 1996 Dec; 94(11):2947-52. PubMed ID: 8941125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can shocks timed to action potentials in low-gradient regions improve both internal and out-of-hospital defibrillation?
    Jones J; Noe W; Tovar O; Lin Y; Hsu W
    J Electrocardiol; 1998; 31 Suppl():41-4. PubMed ID: 9988004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transmural recording of shock potential gradient fields, early postshock activations, and refibrillation episodes associated with external defibrillation of long-duration ventricular fibrillation in swine.
    Allred JD; Killingsworth CR; Allison JS; Dosdall DJ; Melnick SB; Smith WM; Ideker RE; Walcott GP
    Heart Rhythm; 2008 Nov; 5(11):1599-606. PubMed ID: 18984539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanism of cardiac defibrillation in open-chest dogs with unipolar DC-coupled simultaneous activation and shock potential recordings.
    Witkowski FX; Penkoske PA; Plonsey R
    Circulation; 1990 Jul; 82(1):244-60. PubMed ID: 2364513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response of relatively refractory canine myocardium to monophasic and biphasic shocks.
    Daubert JP; Frazier DW; Wolf PD; Franz MR; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1991 Dec; 84(6):2522-38. PubMed ID: 1959202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of electroporation in defibrillation.
    Al-Khadra A; Nikolski V; Efimov IR
    Circ Res; 2000 Oct; 87(9):797-804. PubMed ID: 11055984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Countershock strength-duration relationship for myocardial refractory period extension.
    Sweeney RJ; Gill RM; Reid PR
    Acad Emerg Med; 1995 Jan; 2(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 7606615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanisms of defibrillation. Critical points and the upper limit of vulnerability.
    Walcott GP; Walcott KT; Ideker RE
    J Electrocardiol; 1995; 28 Suppl():1-6. PubMed ID: 8656095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ventricular pacing threshold and refractoriness after defibrillation shocks in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
    Yu JC; Lauer MR; Young C; Liem B; Peterson J; Ottoboni L; Sung RJ
    Am Heart J; 1996 Jun; 131(6):1121-6. PubMed ID: 8644590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterization of ventricular fibrillation based on monophasic action potential morphology in the human heart.
    Swartz JF; Jones JL; Fletcher RD
    Circulation; 1993 Jun; 87(6):1907-14. PubMed ID: 8504503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prolongation and shortening of action potentials by electrical shocks in frog ventricular muscle.
    Knisley SB; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Am J Physiol; 1994 Jun; 266(6 Pt 2):H2348-58. PubMed ID: 8023996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. External exponential biphasic versus monophasic shock waveform: efficacy in ventricular fibrillation of longer duration.
    Yamanouchi Y; Brewer JE; Donohoo AM; Mowrey KA; Wilkoff BL; Tchou PJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Oct; 22(10):1481-7. PubMed ID: 10588150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.