These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7660590)
1. Modulation of motion aftereffect by surround motion and its dependence on stimulus size and eccentricity. Murakami I; Shimojo S Vision Res; 1995 Jul; 35(13):1835-44. PubMed ID: 7660590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adaptation to second-order motion results in a motion aftereffect for directionally-ambiguous test stimuli. Ledgeway T Vision Res; 1994 Nov; 34(21):2879-89. PubMed ID: 7975322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nulling the motion aftereffect with dynamic random-dot stimuli: limitations and implications. Castet E; Keeble DR; Verstraten FA J Vis; 2002; 2(4):302-11. PubMed ID: 12678580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assimilation-type and contrast-type bias of motion induced by the surround in a random-dot display: evidence for center-surround antagonism. Murakami I; Shimojo S Vision Res; 1996 Nov; 36(22):3629-39. PubMed ID: 8976993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Motion aftereffect with flickering test stimuli depends on adapting velocity. Ashida H; Osaka N Vision Res; 1995 Jul; 35(13):1825-33. PubMed ID: 7660589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strong influence of test patterns on the perception of motion aftereffect and position. Fang F; He S J Vis; 2004 Aug; 4(7):637-42. PubMed ID: 15330707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stimulus dependency and mechanisms of surround modulation in cortical area MT. Huang X; Albright TD; Stoner GR J Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 28(51):13889-906. PubMed ID: 19091978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Temporal and spatial frequency tuning of the flicker motion aftereffect. Bex PJ; Verstraten FA; Mareschal I Vision Res; 1996 Sep; 36(17):2721-7. PubMed ID: 8917759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Apparent velocity of motion aftereffects in central and peripheral vision. Wright MJ Perception; 1986; 15(5):603-12. PubMed ID: 3588220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Motion aftereffect with flickering test patterns reveals higher stages of motion processing. Nishida S; Sato T Vision Res; 1995 Feb; 35(4):477-90. PubMed ID: 7900288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Binocular rivalry suppression disrupts recovery from motion adaptation. Wiesenfelder H; Blake R Vis Neurosci; 1992 Aug; 9(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 1504023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complete interocular transfer of motion aftereffect with flickering test. Nishida S; Ashida H; Sato T Vision Res; 1994 Oct; 34(20):2707-16. PubMed ID: 7975308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Topography of the motion aftereffect with and without eye movements. Ezzati A; Golzar A; Afraz AS J Vis; 2008 Dec; 8(14):23.1-16. PubMed ID: 19146324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Movement aftereffect of bi-vectorial transparent motion. Verstraten FA; Fredericksen RE; van de Grind WA Vision Res; 1994 Feb; 34(3):349-58. PubMed ID: 8160370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Motion mechanisms with different spatiotemporal characteristics identified by an MAE technique with superimposed gratings. Shioiri S; Matsumiya K J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):30.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Tootell RB; Reppas JB; Dale AM; Look RB; Sereno MI; Malach R; Brady TJ; Rosen BR Nature; 1995 May; 375(6527):139-41. PubMed ID: 7753168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]