These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7661143)

  • 1. Comparison of different bonding materials for laser debonding.
    Mimura H; Deguchi T; Obata A; Yamagishi T; Ito M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 7661143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC.
    Rix D; Foley TF; Mamandras A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11174538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laser-aided debonding of orthodontic ceramic brackets.
    Strobl K; Bahns TL; Willham L; Bishara SE; Stwalley WC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Feb; 101(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 1531397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nd: YAG laser for debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Hayakawa K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):638-47. PubMed ID: 16286212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bond strengths and remnant adhesive resin on debonding for orthodontic bonding techniques.
    Sinha PK; Nanda RS; Duncanson MG; Hosier MJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 7661148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fabrication and evaluation of Bis-GMA/TEGDMA resin with various amounts of silane-coated silica for orthodontic use.
    Durrani OK; Bashir U; Arshad N
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 21292732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of adhesive resin flexibility on enamel fracture during metal bracket debonding: an ex vivo study.
    Kim YK; Park HS; Kim KH; Kwon TY
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 37(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 25548147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Thermal debonding of ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
    Crooks M; Hood J; Harkness M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Feb; 111(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 9057616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shear bond strengths produced by composite and compomer light cured orthodontic adhesives.
    Rock WP; Abdullah MS
    J Dent; 1997; 25(3-4):243-9. PubMed ID: 9175353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Changes in the enamel after in vitro debonding of brackets bonded with a modified glass ionomer cement].
    Sorel O; el Alam R; Chagneau F; Cathelineau G
    Orthod Fr; 2000 Apr; 71(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 10916640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The extent of enamel surface fractures. A quantitative comparison of thermally debonded ceramic and mechanically debonded metal brackets by energy dispersive micro- and image-analysis.
    Stratmann U; Schaarschmidt K; Wegener H; Ehmer U
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Dec; 18(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 9009430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: an in vitro qualitative study.
    Zarrinnia K; Eid NM; Kehoe MJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):284-93. PubMed ID: 7661146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modification of 4-META/MMA-TBB resin for safe debonding of orthodontic brackets--influence of the addition of degradable additives or fluoride compound.
    Kawabata R; Hayakawa T; Kasai K
    Dent Mater J; 2006 Sep; 25(3):524-32. PubMed ID: 17076323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of debonding pliers in the removal of ceramic brackets: force levels and enamel cracks.
    Bishara SE; Fonseca JM; Boyer DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 7661139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving orthodontic bonding to silver amalgam.
    Zachrisson BU; Büyükyilmaz T; Zachrisson YO
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 7726460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of different time intervals between sealant application and bracket bond on adhesive strength.
    Almeida MA; de Araujo TM; Chevitarese O
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):389-94. PubMed ID: 7942654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interlayer formation and its effect on debonding polycrystalline alumina orthodontic brackets.
    Sinha PK; Rohrer MD; Nanda RS; Brickman CD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Nov; 108(5):455-63. PubMed ID: 7484964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Sinha PK; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 9267223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.