These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7661151)

  • 1. 24-hour shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to porcelain using various adhesion promoters.
    Major PW; Koehler JR; Manning KE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 7661151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to porcelain following etching with Er:YAG laser versus hydrofluoric acid.
    Yassaei S; Moradi F; Aghili H; Kamran MH
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e82-7. PubMed ID: 23646342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bonding orthodontic brackets to porcelain using different adhesives/enamel conditioners: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Oonsombat C; Laffoon J
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15794038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to porcelain.
    Bourke BM; Rock WP
    Br J Orthod; 1999 Dec; 26(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 10592155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC.
    Rix D; Foley TF; Mamandras A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11174538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of surface treatment and bonding agents on bond strength of composite resin to porcelain.
    Suliman AH; Swift EJ; Perdigao J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Aug; 70(2):118-20. PubMed ID: 8396642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to amalgam with different intermediate resins and adhesives.
    Germec D; Cakan U; Ozdemir FI; Arun T; Cakan M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 19073953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Four chemical methods of porcelain conditioning and their influence over bond strength and surface integrity.
    Stella JP; Oliveira AB; Nojima LI; Marquezan M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(4):51-6. PubMed ID: 26352845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adhesion promoters, their effect on the bond strength of metal brackets.
    Newman GV; Newman RA; Sun BI; Ha JL; Ozsoylu SA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 7661138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of different silanes and acid concentrations on bond strength of brackets to porcelain surfaces.
    Trakyali G; Malkondu O; Kazazoğlu E; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):402-6. PubMed ID: 19339674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surface preparation for orthodontic bonding to porcelain.
    Zachrisson YO; Zachrisson BU; Büyükyilmaz T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Apr; 109(4):420-30. PubMed ID: 8638584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bond strength comparison of 2 self-etching primers over a 3-month storage period.
    Trites B; Foley TF; Banting D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):709-16. PubMed ID: 15592220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a comparison of bonding systems.
    Pannes DD; Bailey DK; Thompson JY; Pietz DM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 12589289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of surface conditioning on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to temporary polycarbonate crowns.
    Blakey R; Mah J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 20620836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of 3 adhesion promoters on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets: an in-vitro study.
    Vicente A; Bravo LA; Romero M; Ortíz AJ; Canteras M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):390-5. PubMed ID: 16527635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of porcelain surface treatments on bond strengths of composite resin bonded to porcelain.
    Thurmond JW; Barkmeier WW; Wilwerding TM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Oct; 72(4):355-9. PubMed ID: 7990039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer.
    Sfondrini MF; Cacciafesta V; Pistorio A; Sfondrini G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11174537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The shear bond strength of composite brackets on porcelain teeth.
    Huang TH; Kao CT
    Eur J Orthod; 2001 Aug; 23(4):433-9. PubMed ID: 11544794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tensile bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to porcelain facets.
    Harari D; Shapira-Davis S; Gillis I; Roman I; Redlich M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 May; 123(5):551-4. PubMed ID: 12750675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.