325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7661418)
1. Decay in quality of closed-chest compressions over time.
Hightower D; Thomas SH; Stone CK; Dunn K; March JA
Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Sep; 26(3):300-3. PubMed ID: 7661418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rescuer fatigue: standard versus continuous chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Heidenreich JW; Berg RA; Higdon TA; Ewy GA; Kern KB; Sanders AB
Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1020-6. PubMed ID: 17015418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bystander fatigue and CPR quality by older bystanders: a randomized crossover trial comparing continuous chest compressions and 30:2 compressions to ventilations.
Liu S; Vaillancourt C; Kasaboski A; Taljaard M
CJEM; 2016 Nov; 18(6):461-468. PubMed ID: 27650514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of external closed-chest compressions in a tertiary pediatric setting: missing the mark.
Hamrick JT; Fisher B; Quinto KB; Foley J
Resuscitation; 2010 Jun; 81(6):718-23. PubMed ID: 20226582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of one-rescuer compression/ventilation ratios on cardiopulmonary resuscitation in infant, pediatric, and adult manikins.
Srikantan SK; Berg RA; Cox T; Tice L; Nadkarni VM
Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2005 May; 6(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 15857527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of rescuer fatigue on the quality of chest compressions.
Ochoa FJ; Ramalle-Gómara E; Lisa V; Saralegui I
Resuscitation; 1998 Jun; 37(3):149-52. PubMed ID: 9715774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Resuscitation quality of rotating chest compression providers at one-minute vs. two-minute intervals: A mannequin study.
Kılıç D; Göksu E; Kılıç T; Buyurgan CS
Am J Emerg Med; 2018 May; 36(5):829-833. PubMed ID: 29056392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of compressor fatigue at 150 compressions per minute during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using a large dog manikin.
Reyes-Martínez M; Herrería-Bustillo VJ
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2023; 33(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 37578021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rescuer-limited cardiopulmonary resuscitation as an alternative to 2-min switched CPR in the setting of inhospital cardiac arrest: a randomised cross-over study.
Jo CH; Cho GC; Ahn JH; Park YS; Lee CH
Emerg Med J; 2015 Jul; 32(7):539-43. PubMed ID: 25092797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by EMS personnel and assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques.
Aufderheide TP; Pirrallo RG; Yannopoulos D; Klein JP; von Briesen C; Sparks CW; Deja KA; Conrad CJ; Kitscha DJ; Provo TA; Lurie KG
Resuscitation; 2005 Mar; 64(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 15733766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chest compression quality during CPR of potential contagious patients wearing personal protection equipment.
Cekmen B; Bildik B; Bozan O; Atis SE; Koksal M; Uzuncu HB; Akilli NB
Am J Emerg Med; 2022 Feb; 52():128-131. PubMed ID: 34922231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Decay in chest compression quality due to fatigue is rare during prolonged advanced life support in a manikin model.
Bjørshol CA; Sunde K; Myklebust H; Assmus J; Søreide E
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2011 Aug; 19():46. PubMed ID: 21827652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rescuer fatigue in the elderly: standard vs. hands-only CPR.
Heidenreich JW; Bonner A; Sanders AB
J Emerg Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 20634016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of chest compression rate guidance on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed on manikins.
Jäntti H; Silfvast T; Turpeinen A; Kiviniemi V; Uusaro A
Resuscitation; 2009 Apr; 80(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 19203821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Efficacy of LUCAS in Prehospital Cardiac Arrest Scenarios: A Crossover Mannequin Study.
Gyory RA; Buchle SE; Rodgers D; Lubin JS
West J Emerg Med; 2017 Apr; 18(3):437-445. PubMed ID: 28435494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on manikins: on the floor and in the bed.
Jäntti H; Silfvast T; Turpeinen A; Kiviniemi V; Uusaro A
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2009 Oct; 53(9):1131-7. PubMed ID: 19388894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A 10-s rest improves chest compression quality during hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a prospective, randomized crossover study using a manikin model.
Min MK; Yeom SR; Ryu JH; Kim YI; Park MR; Han SK; Lee SH; Cho SJ
Resuscitation; 2013 Sep; 84(9):1279-84. PubMed ID: 23402967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect on quality of chest compressions and exhaustion of a compression--ventilation ratio of 30:2 versus 15:2 during cardiopulmonary resuscitation--a randomised trial.
Deschilder K; De Vos R; Stockman W
Resuscitation; 2007 Jul; 74(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 17363130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality of lay person CPR performance with compression: ventilation ratios 15:2, 30:2 or continuous chest compressions without ventilations on manikins.
Odegaard S; Saether E; Steen PA; Wik L
Resuscitation; 2006 Dec; 71(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 17069958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rate at 120/min provides qualified chest compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Zou Y; Shi W; Zhu Y; Tao R; Jiang Y; Li S; Ye J; Lu Y; Jiang J; Tong J
Am J Emerg Med; 2015 Apr; 33(4):535-8. PubMed ID: 25662803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
